Stacking Storage Arrangement with Angled Vehicle Movement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional stacking storage arrangements are limited in their operational flexibility and efficiency, particularly in the movement of loading vehicles outside the loading space and the positioning of containers based on turnover frequency, which affects the time and cost of container placement and removal.

Innovation Solution

The loading vehicle is configured to move in any desired direction outside the loading space, with a driving surface extending beyond the loading space, and a control device optimizes container positioning within the storage arrangement based on turnover frequency, allowing for dynamic reconfiguration and reduced restacking needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the loading vehicle is constrained to move only in directions parallel to the rows inside the loading space, then the control and operation is simplified, but the operational flexibility and efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the operational space into two distinct zones: the loading space with constrained movement (parallel to rows only) and the external area with full directional freedom. This segmentation allows the loading vehicle to enjoy simplified control within the loading space while gaining operational flexibility in the external area, effectively resolving the contradiction between control simplicity and operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If containers are stored in fixed positions without optimization, then the storage structure is simple, but the time and cost for container placement and removal increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage structure complexityVSAvoidcontainer handling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device pre-calculates and determines the optimal storage positions for containers based on their turnover frequency before actual storage operations begin. High-turnover containers are assigned to easily accessible positions, while low-turnover containers are placed in less accessible positions. This preliminary optimization reduces the time and cost for future container placement and removal operations without requiring complex mechanical storage structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If high-turnover containers are not prioritized in positioning, then the storage arrangement is uniform and simple, but the time for container removal and placement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage arrangement complexityVSAvoidcontainer handling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different storage strategies to different containers based on their local characteristics (turnover frequency). High-turnover containers are positioned in easily accessible locations requiring minimal movement, while low-turnover containers are placed in positions that are less accessible. This localized optimization of container positions based on their specific needs reduces overall container handling time without requiring complex storage structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances operational efficiency by allowing flexible movement of loading vehicles and optimizing container placement, reducing time and costs associated with container handling and restacking, while ensuring that high-turnover containers are easily accessible for quick removal and placement.

Implementation Method 1

The holding device thereby engages, up to this point, the second-to-last container of the stack from below, so that the remaining stack is held in the container receiving space

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS12006148B2Stacking storage arrangement
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 JUNGHEINRICH AG
  • US12006148B2 patent drawing
  • US12006148B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stacking storage arrangement having multiple container receiving spaces that are arranged in multiple rows and columns, wherein a loading space in which at least one loading vehicle can be moved is arranged beneath the container receiving spaces. The operation of a stacking storage arrangement of this type is configured to be economical. For this purpose, it is provided that, at least outside of the loading space, the loading vehicle can be moved in a direction which forms any desired angle with a direction that runs parallel to the rows.