Staff Workflow Management System for Optimal Task Assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for managing staff and engagements in professional services entities, such as accounting and law firms, fail to account for factors beyond availability when assigning tasks, neglecting credentials, capabilities, past experience, and other critical criteria that determine the best-suited staff member for a task.

Innovation Solution

A software application and database system that processes staff and engagement data to match employee capabilities with task requirements, considering availability, expertise, experience, and performance evaluations to automatically schedule staff for optimal task assignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If comprehensive staff criteria (credentials, capabilities, experience, performance) are tracked and considered for task assignment, then staff utilization and task completion efficiency are improved, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments staff evaluation into distinct modules: credential tracking, capability assessment, experience logging, and performance evaluation. Each module independently captures specific data types, which are then integrated by the workflow management system to generate comprehensive staff profiles for task assignment decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The workflow management system acts as an intermediary that automatically processes and integrates multiple data sources (credentials, capabilities, experience, performance) to generate staff recommendations. This intermediary layer shields users from the underlying system complexity while delivering improved task assignment efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If automated staff scheduling based on multiple criteria is implemented, then resource allocation optimality is improved, but implementation complexity and initial setup requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation optimalityVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing staff profiles that include credentials, capabilities, experience, and performance data before task assignment occurs. This advance preparation enables the automated scheduling algorithm to quickly generate optimal recommendations without complex real-time analysis, reducing implementation barriers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms qualitative staff attributes (credentials, capabilities, experience) into quantifiable parameters that can be processed by the automated scheduling system. By converting these diverse attributes into standardized evaluation parameters, the system achieves reliable resource allocation while maintaining ease of implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If detailed staff performance tracking and evaluation are implemented, then staff selection accuracy for specific tasks is improved, but data collection and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestaff selection accuracyVSAvoiddata collection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous tracking of staff performance metrics and automatically updates staff profiles as new data becomes available. This continuous data collection approach eliminates periodic data gathering bursts, maintaining high staff selection accuracy while minimizing disruption to workflow and reducing perceived data collection time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The workflow management system automatically collects and processes performance data without requiring manual intervention. The system self-updates staff evaluations by integrating data from multiple sources, thereby achieving precise staff selection while eliminating the time cost of manual data collection and processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9779386B2Method and system for implementing workflows and managing staff and engagements
Publication Date: 2017.10.03 THOMSON REUTERS ENTERPRISE CENTRE GMBH
  • US9779386B2 patent drawing
  • US9779386B2 patent drawing
  • US9779386B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to software and a method of use for implementing workflows and managing engagements and staff. More particularly, the present invention relates to a software module tracking data of staff, engagements and workflows and a method of using such data in the management of staff and assignment of tasks. Information concerning employees is input into a database by the manager and the employees, and is tracked therein. The information concerning an employee includes an employee's availability, ability and experience. Workflow/Task information is input into the database when either a client makes a request for service of the business, or a workflow/task internal to the business is needed to be performed. Task information includes the nature of the work and deadlines. Task information is compared to the employee information. A list is automatically generated naming the employees best suited to the mandate of the task. The manager then chooses a name from the top of the list and assigns the task to that employee.