Predicting Future Staffing Skills via Historical Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current project team staffing methods fail to effectively identify and recruit workers with requisite skills needed in the future, as they focus on immediate needs rather than future requirements, leading to potential skill gaps.

Innovation Solution

A processor-implemented method that analyzes historical data and current skill sets of candidate workers, combined with available skill enhancers, to predict future skill sets and recommend candidates who can develop the necessary skills to fill future project team gaps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If historical data and skill enhancers are used to predict future skill sets, then future skill needs are accurately identified, but computational complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting and processing historical skill data and identifying skill enhancers in advance. This allows the prediction model to be pre-trained and validated before actual staffing decisions are made, improving prediction accuracy without increasing real-time computational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified copies of complex skill development patterns by using historical data to establish predictive models. These models replicate the relationship between antecedent conditions, skill enhancers, and future skill sets without requiring full re-analysis of all historical data for each prediction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If candidate workers are evaluated based on potential future skills rather than current skills, then future skill gaps are prevented, but evaluation complexity and time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestaffing reliabilityVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation by predicting future skill sets before actual staffing needs arise. This allows organizations to proactively identify and recruit candidates who will develop required skills, preventing skill gaps rather than reacting to them

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual, time-consuming evaluation processes with automated computational models that analyze historical data and predict future skill sets. This substitution dramatically reduces evaluation time while maintaining or improving assessment quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9141924B2Generating recommendations for staffing a project team
Publication Date: 2015.09.22 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9141924B2 patent drawing
  • US9141924B2 patent drawing
  • US9141924B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A processor-implemented method, system, and/or computer program product generates a recommendation for a worker to be included in a project team. A requisite skill set that is not presently needed, but will be needed in the future, by a project team is determined. Historical data that describe antecedent conditions, which caused a historical worker to obtain the requisite skill set, is received. A candidate worker's current skill set data is adjusted with skill set enhancers, which are available to members of the project team, to generate a predicted future skill set of the candidate worker. In response to the needed requisite skill set matching the predicted future skill set of the candidate worker, a recommendation is generated for adding that candidate worker to the project team.