Microscope Stage Acceleration Control for Fluid Fluctuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for observing pluripotent stem cells using microscopes face challenges in achieving high-speed image acquisition while maintaining image quality due to fluid level fluctuations in culture vessels, making it difficult to combine rapid imaging with high-quality results.

Innovation Solution

An observation device and control method that adjust the stage's acceleration based on information about the subject, vessel, and observation conditions, using a combination of image-forming optical systems like phase-difference, bright-field, and epifluorescence to minimize the impact of fluid level fluctuations, allowing for faster and higher-quality image acquisition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the stage is moved quickly to scan observation positions, then image acquisition speed is improved, but image quality deteriorates due to fluid level fluctuation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage acquisition speedVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the stage acceleration adjustable and adaptable to different observation conditions. The control unit dynamically changes acceleration parameters based on the type of culture vessel, observation method, and other conditions, allowing the system to optimize between speed and image quality rather than using a fixed acceleration value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by modifying the acceleration parameter based on multiple conditions including vessel type (well plate, flask, etc.), observation method (phase-difference, fluorescence, etc.), and culture fluid characteristics. This allows the system to select optimal acceleration values that balance imaging speed with image quality for each specific scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the stage acceleration is reduced to prevent fluid level fluctuation, then image quality is improved, but image acquisition time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidimage acquisition time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the acceleration parameter based on multiple conditions to find the optimal balance between image quality and acquisition time. Different acceleration values are set for different vessel types, observation methods, and culture fluid conditions, allowing fast acquisition when possible while maintaining quality when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback by having the control unit determine acceleration based on information about the culture vessel, observation method, and other conditions. This feedback mechanism allows the system to automatically adjust acceleration to prevent fluid level fluctuations that would degrade image quality, while still maintaining efficient acquisition speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If uniform low acceleration is used to gradually accelerate the stage, then image quality is maintained, but scanning time for all observation positions becomes excessively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidscanning efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements parameter changes by setting different acceleration values for different phases and conditions of the scanning process. Rather than using uniformly low acceleration, the system adjusts acceleration based on vessel type, observation method, and position, allowing faster scanning when conditions permit while maintaining image quality when fluid level stability is critical.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3605185B1Observation device, observation control method, and observation control program
Publication Date: 2022.12.21 FUJIFILM CORP
  • EP3605185B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3605185B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3605185B1 patent drawingFigure 4A~4C

AI summary

An observation device includes: a stage (11) on which a vessel in which a subject is stored is installed; an image-forming optical system (17) that includes an objective lens forming an image of the subject stored in the vessel; a scan control unit (22) that moves the stage (11) with respect to the image-forming optical system (17) to scan each observation position in the vessel by the image-forming optical system (17); and an acceleration-determination-information acquisition unit (24) that acquires at least one piece of information among information about the subject, information about the vessel, information about an observation method, or information about an observation condition. The scan control unit (22) controls an acceleration of the stage on the basis of the at least one piece of information.