Stage-Divided Thermal Reactor for Clean Hot Gas from Solid Fuels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing combustion technologies face challenges in producing clean hot flue gas with low VOCs, NOx, and dust, and clean ash with low carbon content, particularly when handling biomass and waste fuels, due to high volatile content, water content, and ash melting issues, leading to inefficiencies and environmental concerns.

Innovation Solution

A stage-divided thermal reactor system utilizing updraft gasification with separate stages for drying, pyrolysis, char gasification, and ash burn-out, where the gas combustion stage serves as both a gas burner and heat source, optimizing temperature control and air distribution to minimize NOx formation and achieve high char burn-out, resulting in a compact and efficient combustion process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If conventional combustion technologies are used to produce hot flue gas from biomass and waste, then energy conversion is achieved, but the flue gas contains high levels of VOCs, NOx, and dust, and ash has high carbon content

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVOCs, NOx, dust emissionsVSAvoidenergy conversion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The combustion process is divided into multiple distinct stages: drying, pyrolysis, char gasification, and ash burn-out. Each stage occurs in a separate zone within the reactor, allowing targeted control of temperature and atmosphere to minimize harmful emissions while maintaining energy efficiency. The pyrolysis zone operates under oxygen-starved conditions to prevent NOx formation, while the gasification zone converts volatiles to combustible gas that is later burned cleanly in the combustion zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes temperature, oxygen concentration, and residence time parameters across different zones to optimize both emission reduction and energy conversion. The pyrolysis zone maintains temperatures around 800-1000°C with limited oxygen, while the gasification zone operates at similar temperatures with controlled air injection. The combustion zone then burns the produced gas at high temperature with sufficient oxygen to complete oxidation of CO to CO2, reducing VOCs and CO emissions while maintaining thermal efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If high temperature combustion is used to improve energy efficiency, then energy conversion efficiency increases, but NOx formation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy conversion efficiencyVSAvoidNOx emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor separates the fuel processing function from the combustion function. Pyrolysis and gasification occur in oxygen-starved zones at moderate temperatures, producing combustible gas without significant NOx formation. The generated gas is then burned in a dedicated combustion zone where high temperature is maintained briefly for complete oxidation, but the mass of nitrogen exposed to high temperature is minimized, reducing thermal NOx formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary pyrolysis and gasification to convert solid fuel into combustible gas before combustion. This preliminary action removes volatile matter and converts carbon to a gaseous state that can be burned more completely and cleanly, improving energy conversion efficiency while allowing better control of combustion temperature and duration to minimize NOx formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-generated harmful factors

If complete combustion is achieved to reduce carbon content in ash, then carbon content in ash decreases, but energy efficiency decreases due to heat loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon content in ashVSAvoidheat loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates carbon conversion into two pathways: char gasification in the gasification zone converts carbon to CO and H2, and CO combustion in the combustion zone completes oxidation. This segmentation allows carbon to be converted to combustible gas that can be burned efficiently, achieving low carbon ash content while recovering energy from the combustion process rather than losing heat.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous operation where pyrolysis, gasification, and combustion occur simultaneously in different zones. The heat from combustion is continuously transferred to maintain pyrolysis and gasification reactions, creating a self-sustaining thermal cycle that minimizes external energy input and heat loss while ensuring complete carbon conversion to achieve low carbon ash content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Object-generated harmful factors

If biomass and waste fuels are used instead of coal, then environmental benefits increase, but combustion challenges increase due to high volatile and water content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental impactVSAvoidcombustion process control
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is divided into specialized zones that address the specific challenges of biomass and waste: a drying zone removes high moisture content, a pyrolysis zone handles high volatile content under controlled atmosphere, and a gasification zone converts residual carbon. This segmentation simplifies control by assigning specific functions to each zone, making the combustion of challenging fuels as manageable as coal combustion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adjusts oxygen concentration, temperature, and residence time parameters across different zones to accommodate the variable composition of biomass and waste. The drying zone operates at lower temperatures with abundant oxygen, while the pyrolysis zone uses oxygen-starved conditions, and the combustion zone provides sufficient oxygen for complete burnout. These parameter changes enable efficient combustion of high-moisture, high-volatile fuels without increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively decomposes biomass and waste into clean flue gas and ash with low carbon content, reducing NOx and particle emissions, and simplifying ash removal, while allowing for a wide fuel spectrum usage and lower operational costs, achieving high energy efficiency and environmental benefits.

Implementation Method 1

a pyrolysis stage, in which the fuel is pyrolysed without addition of oxygen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

a drying stage, in which the fuel is dried

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

The char is subjected to gasification in the second zone by introduction of primary combustion air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGasification:

Implementation Method 4

The off gases from the second zone and the pyrolysis gases from the first zone or zones are thereafter subjected to secondary combustion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 5

by injecting water into the gas at one or more injection zones in such an amount and in such a way that, due to water evaporation, the gas temperature is reduced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporative cooling: Evaporation

Implementation Method 6

The gas can then be led through a condensing heat exchanger unit, wherein at least some of contents of water vapour in the gas are condensed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Data Source

PatentEP2334762B1Method for production of a clean hot gas based on solid fuels
Publication Date: 2018.10.10 DALL ENERGY APS
  • EP2334762B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2334762B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2334762B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Solid fuel can be converted into a clean hot flue gas with a low content of volatile organic compounds (VOC's), NOx and dust, and clean ash with a low carbon content by means of a stage-divided thermal reactor, where the conversion process of the solid fuel is in separate vertical stages (from below and up): ash burn-out, char oxidation and gasification, pyrolysis, drying, and a gas combustion stage where gas from the gasifier is combusted.