Stage-wise Interaction Analysis Engine for Sales Drop-off Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for analyzing user-agent interactions in sales contexts are inadequate, failing to effectively predict interaction stages and identify drop-off points, which hampers sales processes and user experience.

Innovation Solution

A predictive analysis engine that classifies user-agent interactions into stages such as greetings, problem identification, and closure, and identifies drop-off points to provide recommendations for improving sales interactions by altering the interaction flow and personalizing user experiences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If minimal analysis is performed on interaction data, then processing time and computational resources are reduced, but the ability to understand interaction factors and improve sales experience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoidinteraction analysis quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of interactions into stages (greetings, problem identification, details gathering, troubleshooting, closure) before detailed analysis. This preliminary structuring enables efficient processing by organizing data in advance, allowing the system to quickly identify relevant interaction factors without exhaustive analysis of entire conversation transcripts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The interaction analysis is segmented into distinct stages (greetings, problem identification, details gathering, troubleshooting, closure), with each stage analyzed separately for specific interaction factors. This segmentation allows the system to focus computational resources on critical decision points rather than processing all interaction data uniformly, resolving the contradiction between processing efficiency and analysis depth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of information

If detailed stage-wise analysis is performed on interactions, then understanding of sales drivers and interaction factors is improved, but system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction understandingVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex analysis task is divided into manageable segments corresponding to interaction stages (greetings, problem identification, details gathering, troubleshooting, closure). Each segment analyzes specific interaction factors relevant to that stage, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive understanding through structured modular analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary classification of interactions into standardized stages before detailed factor analysis. This preliminary structuring creates a framework that simplifies subsequent analysis by organizing unstructured conversation data into predictable categories, reducing computational complexity while preserving interaction nuances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If drop-off points are predicted and recommendations are provided to agents, then sales conversion rates are improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesales conversion rateVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system predicts drop-off points and generates recommendations in advance during the interaction process, rather than analyzing complete interactions after they end. This real-time preliminary analysis allows agents to receive actionable insights immediately, improving conversion rates while minimizing processing time by avoiding post-interaction batch analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system focuses computational resources on predicting drop-off points at critical interaction stages rather than uniformly analyzing all interactions. By identifying and analyzing only the specific stages where drop-offs are most likely to occur, the system optimizes the balance between processing efficiency and conversion improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10225405B2Stage-wise analysis of text-based interactions
Publication Date: 2019.03.05 24 7 AI INC
  • US10225405B2 patent drawing
  • US10225405B2 patent drawing
  • US10225405B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The stages of an interaction between a potential customer (the user) and a sales representative (the agent) during a sales interaction are identified to understand the interaction factors that drive sales and, by doing so, to serve the customer better and thus increase sales. Initially, a user makes contact with an agent via a communications network. During the interaction, a dropping point is reached, i.e. the point in the interaction at which either the user or the agent ends the interaction. The dropping point and other interaction factors is analyzed. Based upon such analysis, various recommendations are made to the agents to improve the user's sales experience.