Staged Biofuel Combustion for Low NOx Emissions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Burning biofuels on stoker grates in power plants results in unpredictable combustion reactions, leading to high NOx emissions, which are difficult to control and require resource-intensive and expensive SNCRs and SCRs for reduction, with risks of NOx formation and ammonia slip under improper temperature conditions.

Innovation Solution

A system with a combustion chamber having two stages and staged air introduction, where biofuel is combusted in a suspended state with a first air stream providing 50-70% of the air in the first stage and a second air stream providing the remaining air in the second stage, tangentially firing the biofuel to control combustion stoichiometry and reduce NOx formation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If biofuel is burned on a stoker grate, then combustion occurs, but the combustion reaction becomes unpredictable and uncontrolled, leading to high NOx emissions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion controlVSAvoidNOx emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The combustion process is divided into multiple stages with distinct air-to-fuel ratios. The first stage uses a fuel-rich mixture (low air-to-fuel ratio) to limit NOx formation, while the second stage uses a fuel-lean mixture (high air-to-fuel ratio) to complete combustion. This segmentation of the combustion process into controlled stages enables predictable emissions while maintaining complete burnout of the biofuel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The primary air stream is introduced at the first stage before the secondary air stream at the second stage. By establishing the fuel-rich combustion environment first, the system proactively controls the combustion chemistry to suppress NOx formation before it occurs, then completes the combustion process in the second stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-generated harmful factors

If SNCRs and SCRs are employed to reduce NOx emissions, then NOx emissions decrease, but operational costs and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx emissionsVSAvoidNOx reduction systems
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The combustion system itself performs the NOx reduction function through staged air introduction and control of combustion stoichiometry. By designing the burners to inject air and fuel in specific sequences and proportions, the system achieves low NOx emissions through its own combustion process rather than requiring separate treatment systems like SNCR or SCR.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The NOx reduction function is extracted from separate treatment systems (SNCR/SCR) and integrated directly into the combustion process itself. By incorporating air staging and fuel staging within the burners, the system eliminates the need for downstream NOx reduction equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If ammonia is injected for NOx reduction, then NOx emissions decrease, but ammonia slip and additional NOx formation may occur under improper temperature conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx emissionsVSAvoidemission control stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The combustion system uses its own air and fuel streams to achieve NOx reduction without external chemical additives. The staged combustion process inherently controls NOx formation through temperature and stoichiometry management, eliminating the need for ammonia injection and its associated risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces NOx emissions to as low as 0.08 lb/MBtu without additional NOx reduction systems, eliminating the need for SNCRs and allowing for smaller SCR units, thereby reducing operational costs and improving combustion control.

Implementation Method 1

combustion of the biofuel in a suspended state while flowing from the first stage to the second stage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

biofuel is combusted in a suspended state while flowing from the first stage to the second stage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP3583356B1Method for firing a biofuel
Publication Date: 2023.01.11 GENERAL ELECTRIC TECH GMBH
  • EP3583356B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3583356B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3583356B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of firing a biofuel is provided. The method includes: introducing the biofuel into a combustion chamber having a first stage and a second stage; combusting the biofuel in a suspended state while flowing from the first stage to the second stage; and introducing a first air stream and a second air stream into the combustion chamber at the first stage and at the second stage, respectively, to facilitate combustion of the biofuel.