Staged Fuel Injection Combustor Gap Utilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional gas turbine combustion systems face limitations in achieving higher firing temperatures while maintaining acceptable NOx emission levels and minimizing aerodynamic pressure losses and leakage, due to the sensitivity of NOx emissions to operating temperatures and combustion characteristics.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a gas turbine design that includes a combustor coupled with a turbine, featuring a gap at the interface between the combustor and turbine, where a fuel injector is positioned to inject fuel into the airflow passing through the gap, which is expanded to accommodate increased airflow, effectively utilizing a former leakage pathway for staged fuel and air injection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If higher operating temperatures are used to improve engine efficiency, then engine efficiency is improved, but NOx emission levels increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine efficiencyVSAvoidNOx emission levels
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel and air injection is divided into multiple axial stages along the combustor length. Primary injection occurs at the forward end, with additional downstream injectors positioned at spaced intervals. This segmentation allows different zones to operate at different temperatures and mixture ratios, enabling higher overall firing temperatures while maintaining lower NOx formation zones through leaner mixtures in downstream regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different axial zones of the combustor are given different local characteristics through staged injection. The forward zone operates with richer mixtures and higher temperatures for efficient combustion, while downstream zones use leaner mixtures to control NOx formation. This local differentiation of mixture quality and temperature allows the system to achieve high overall efficiency while limiting harmful emissions in specific regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-generated harmful factors

If air volume is increased to enable axially staged injection, then emission control is improved, but aerodynamic pressure losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission levelsVSAvoidaerodynamic pressure losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The injection system transitions from a single-point axial injection to a multi-dimensional staged approach with injectors distributed both axially and radially. Downstream injectors are positioned to utilize the existing airflow pattern and pressure distribution at different axial locations, injecting fuel into regions where the airflow already has favorable properties. This dimensional distribution allows the system to achieve better emission control without proportionally increasing total air volume, thereby limiting aerodynamic penalties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Quantity of substance

If leakage pathways are expanded to accommodate increased airflow for staged injection, then airflow requirements are met, but leakage losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairflow volumeVSAvoidair leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The design accepts and utilizes the inevitable leakage pathways at the combustor-turbine interface rather than attempting to eliminate them. By positioning downstream fuel injectors near these gap regions, the system converts what would be pure leakage losses into useful fuel-air mixing zones. The leaked air, which would otherwise represent a loss, is instead utilized as part of the combustion process in downstream zones, thereby reducing the net penalty of having expanded leakage pathways while still meeting the increased airflow requirements for staged injection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances engine efficiency by reducing NOx emissions, minimizing aerodynamic pressure losses, and optimizing airflow, allowing for increased firing temperatures without significant emissions penalties.

Implementation Method 1

a fuel injector disposed near the gap for injecting a fuel into an airflow that passes through the gap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid injection and mixing:

Implementation Method 2

combustor coupled to a turbine that together define a working fluid flowpath

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentEP3351855B1Staged fuel and air injection in combustion systems of gas turbines
Publication Date: 2020.04.22 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP3351855B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3351855B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3351855B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A gas turbine that includes: a combustor 13 coupled to a turbine 12 that together define a working fluid flowpath 37, the working fluid flowpath extending aftward along a longitudinal axis from a forward end 67 defined by a forward injector 21 in the combustor, through an interface at which the combustor ends and the turbine begins, and then through the turbine to an aftward end; a gap formed at the interface between the combustor 13 and the turbine 12; and a fuel injector 51 disposed near the gap for injecting a fuel into an airflow that passes through the gap. The gap may include a former leakage pathway occurring at the interface. The former leakage pathway may be expanded so to accommodate a desired level for the airflow passing therethrough.