Staged ML Risk Assessment for Lower Computer Resource Use

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing risk assessment methods consume excessive computer resources due to the need to process and transmit entire questionnaires, which is not optimal in terms of processing and remote client-server connections.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that uses incremental machine learning models to assess risk, where demographic data is initially evaluated, and only if thresholds are not met, additional context-specific data is gathered and evaluated by subsequent models, thereby minimizing unnecessary resource use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the entire questionnaire is processed and transmitted for risk assessment, then the assessment completeness is improved, but the computer resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment completenessVSAvoidcomputer resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The risk assessment process is divided into multiple stages: initial demographic data processing, intermediate risk score calculation, and conditional detailed assessment. Only subjects who fail the initial threshold assessment proceed to the next stage, avoiding unnecessary processing of complete questionnaires for low-risk subjects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary risk assessment using demographic data before requiring completion of the entire questionnaire. This preliminary action filters out subjects who can be approved or rejected based on initial criteria, preventing unnecessary transmission and processing of additional questionnaire data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If supplemental context-related subject data is collected and processed for all subjects, then the assessment accuracy is improved, but the data transmission and processing load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment accuracyVSAvoiddata transmission volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Different levels of data collection are applied to different subjects based on their initial risk assessment. Subjects who pass the initial threshold receive basic demographic assessment, while only those who fail proceed to supplemental data collection, creating localized data quality appropriate to each subject's risk profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system collects complete supplemental context-related data only when necessary (for subjects failing initial assessment), rather than for all subjects. This partial action approach ensures data accuracy where needed while avoiding excessive data collection and transmission for subjects who can be assessed with minimal data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If multiple machine learning models are sequentially applied, then the risk assessment precision is improved, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The multi-model assessment is segmented into conditional stages. The first machine learning model processes demographic data initially, and only subjects failing this first model proceed to the second model with supplemental data. This segmentation ensures multiple models are applied only when necessary, reducing overall processing time while maintaining precision for complex cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first machine learning model performs preliminary filtering before the second model is engaged. This preliminary action using demographic data alone quickly identifies subjects who need further assessment, preventing unnecessary execution of the more computationally intensive second model for all subjects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260056792A1Managing computer resource use when conducting computer-implemented risk assessment
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
  • US20260056792A1 patent drawing
  • US20260056792A1 patent drawing
  • US20260056792A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for managing computer resource use in computer-implemented risk assessment of a subject in respect of a context. Demographic subject data for the subject is passed to a first trained machine learning model trained on first context-specific historical risk outcomes correlated with historical demographic data corresponding to the demographic subject data. If a first threshold assessment from the first trained machine learning model is passed, the subject is approved. Responsive to failing the first threshold assessment, supplemental context-related subject data for the subject, in addition to the demographic subject data, is passed with the demographic subject data to a second trained machine learning model trained on second context-specific historical risk outcomes correlated with the historical demographic data and with historical context-related data corresponding to the supplemental context-related subject data. If a second threshold assessment from the second trained machine learning model is passed, the subject is approved.