Staged Pressure Reduction for Freeze-Drying

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Freeze drying processes often result in uncontrolled gas escape and foaming, particularly at higher fill levels, leading to potential product loss during the freezing phase.

Innovation Solution

A method involving staged pressure reduction for degassing, with defined stopping points and pressure increases, allowing for controlled degassing and prevention of bubbling, ensuring safe process control and optimized conditions for freeze-drying.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the pressure in the product chamber is rapidly reduced to initiate freezing, then the freezing process is accelerated, but uncontrolled gas escape and foaming occur leading to product loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefreezing speedVSAvoidproduct loss
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure reduction process is segmented into multiple stages with defined stopping points. The method divides the continuous pressure reduction into discrete steps, allowing controlled degassing at each stage before proceeding to the next lower pressure level. This segmentation prevents uncontrolled gas escape and foaming while maintaining efficient freezing progress.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method performs preliminary degassing actions at each stopping point before continuing with pressure reduction. By pausing at defined pressure levels to allow gas to escape controllably, the system prepares the product for subsequent freezing stages without the harmful effects of uncontrolled gas expansion. This preliminary action prevents product loss while setting up conditions for rapid freezing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If the pressure is reduced continuously without stopping points, then the process time is shortened, but gas control becomes uncontrolled leading to foaming and product escape

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess timeVSAvoidgas control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The method dynamically adjusts the pressure reduction process by incorporating adaptive stopping points and breakpoint durations. The system monitors pressure increases and adjusts the timing and duration of stopping points based on real-time conditions. This dynamic approach maintains reliable gas control while minimizing overall process time through optimized pause durations at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The method employs feedback mechanisms by monitoring pressure increases at stopping points to detect when degassing is complete. The system uses this feedback information to determine when to resume pressure reduction and how long to maintain each stopping point. This feedback-based control ensures reliable gas management while preventing excessive process delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If high fill levels are used in containers, then the productivity is increased, but the risk of product escape during outgassing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefill levelVSAvoidproduct escape risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The method provides beforehand cushioning by implementing controlled degassing stages before freezing begins. At each stopping point, the system allows gas to escape in a controlled manner, cushioning against the pressure build-up that would otherwise cause foaming and product escape during subsequent freezing. This protective measure enables high fill levels to be used safely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The method changes pressure parameters in a controlled sequence during the degassing phase. By systematically varying pressure levels and maintaining them at defined stopping points, the system manages gas expansion forces that affect high-fill containers. These parameter changes reduce the harmful effects of gas pressure while maintaining high productivity through efficient use of container volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively prevents bubbling and ensures controlled gas release, maintaining product integrity and preventing escape, even at high fill levels, by monitoring pressure increases and gradients to manage the degassing process.

Implementation Method 1

a vacuum pump (6) which is connected to the product chamber (2) and is used to reduce the pressure in the product chamber (2)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

the product being cooled and frozen, the product usually being cooled to a specific freezing temperature and the freezing temperature being maintained until the solvent portion of the product freezes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFreezing: Freezing

Implementation Method 3

During primary drying, a vacuum is applied and the solvent contained in the product sublimates at temperatures below freezing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSublimation: Sublimation

Data Source

PatentEP3462116B1Method for freeze-drying
Publication Date: 2020.06.03 OPTIMA PHARMA GMBH
  • EP3462116B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

The invention relates to a method and a device for freeze-drying a product containing a solvent, filled in containers, in particular vials, in a product chamber (2), comprising a freezing phase and a drying phase, wherein, prior to the freezing phase, the pressure in the product chamber is gradually reduced to a pressure below atmospheric pressure and above a product-specific nucleation pressure by approaching at least one holding point for degassing, wherein the pressure reduction is stopped at the at least one holding point for partial degassing and, after a defined holding point duration and/or after detection of the completion of partial degassing, the pressure reduction is continued.wherein at least one holding point a pressure increase in the product chamber (2) is detected during or before an execution of the process and the holding point duration is defined based on a profile of the pressure increase and/or the completion of the partial degassing is detected.