Staggered Aperture E-Beam Lithography Fill Patterns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current e-beam lithography technologies face challenges in achieving high throughput and precision for advanced integrated circuit manufacturing, particularly in scaling down via pitches and maintaining overlay tolerances, which limits their adoption in high-volume manufacturing environments.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a staggered beam aperture array with overlapping apertures and the use of dummy fill patterns to stabilize current density, allowing for improved lithography process margin and enabling the patterning of small features with increased resolution and throughput.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional e-beam lithography is used for patterning, then manufacturing precision can be achieved, but productivity is limited due to low throughput

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatterning precisionVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single e-beam writing process into multiple passes with different aperture configurations. The first pass uses a first aperture to write first patterns, and the second pass uses a second aperture to write second patterns, thereby segmenting the overall patterning process to improve throughput while maintaining precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic aperture switching between at least two different apertures during the e-beam writing process. The system dynamically selects and switches between apertures with different sizes and/or shapes based on the specific patterning requirements, enabling flexible adaptation to different feature sizes and improving overall productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If single aperture e-beam writing is used, then device complexity is low, but manufacturing precision deteriorates for small features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaperture configurationVSAvoidsmall feature patterning
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters of the aperture (size, shape) to optimize the e-beam writing process for different feature dimensions. By using multiple apertures with different parameters, the system can achieve high manufacturing precision for small features while managing device complexity through systematic aperture selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If e-beam lithography is used for advanced scaling, then manufacturing precision improves, but productivity decreases due to process complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature scaling precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by preparing multiple apertures in advance with different configurations. This preliminary preparation enables the system to quickly switch between aperture types during the writing process, thereby maintaining high manufacturing precision for advanced scaling while improving productivity by reducing setup time and process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the capability of e-beam lithography to pattern small features with improved resolution and throughput, addressing the limitations of current technologies in high-volume manufacturing by stabilizing current density and reducing focus variations.

Implementation Method 1

aligning the substrate in an e-beam tool to provide the pattern of parallel lines parallel with a scan direction of the e-beam tool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron Beam: Electron Beam

Data Source

PatentUS11581162B2Fill pattern to enhance ebeam process margin
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 INTEL CORP
  • US11581162B2 patent drawing
  • US11581162B2 patent drawing
  • US11581162B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Lithographic apparatuses suitable for complementary e-beam lithography (CEBL) are described. In an example, a method of forming a pattern for a semiconductor structure includes forming a pattern of parallel lines above a substrate. The method also includes aligning the substrate in an e-beam tool to provide the pattern of parallel lines parallel with a scan direction of the e-beam tool. The e-beam tool includes a column having a blanker aperture array (BAA) with a staggered pair of columns of openings along an array direction orthogonal to the scan direction. The method also includes forming a pattern of cuts or vias in or above the pattern of parallel lines to provide line breaks for the pattern of parallel lines by scanning the substrate along the scan direction. A cumulative current through the column has a non-zero and substantially uniform cumulative current value throughout the scanning.