Staggered Rolling Cone Drill Bit Cutting Elements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional rolling cone drill bits face challenges in maintaining high rate of penetration (ROP) and durability, leading to increased drilling time and costs due to excessive wear of heel inserts, which accelerates bit failure and requires frequent bit changes.

Innovation Solution

The design features a rolling cone drill bit with staggered and overlapping cutting elements on the cone cutters, increasing the number of bottomhole cutting elements in the drive zone, which enhances load sharing and durability, and allows for a larger cone offset, thereby improving ROP and extending bit life.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional cutting element placement is used, then the bit structure is simple, but the rate of penetration is low and bit life is short due to excessive wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverate of penetrationVSAvoidbit life
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting elements are divided into multiple rows (heel row, gage row, and multiple bottomhole rows) with different functions. The heel row maintains borehole gage, the gage row cuts corners, and the bottomhole rows perform primary cutting. This segmentation allows each row to be optimized for its specific function, improving overall productivity and bit life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from conventional single-row or two-row cutting element placement to a multi-dimensional arrangement with multiple bottomhole rows staggered at different axial positions. This dimensional expansion increases the number of cutting elements engaged simultaneously, enhancing the rate of penetration without compromising bit life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the number of cutting elements is increased, then the rate of penetration improves, but the complexity of the cutting structure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverate of penetrationVSAvoidcutting structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting elements are organized into distinct functional rows (heel, gage, bottomhole) with clear spatial separation. This segmentation allows the complex multi-row structure to be managed systematically, with each row serving a specific purpose, thereby reducing the perceived complexity despite the increased number of elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different rows have different densities and configurations tailored to their specific functions. The bottomhole rows have higher density for cutting, while the heel row has lower density for gage maintenance. This localized optimization allows high productivity without uniform complexity throughout the entire cutting structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If heel inserts are used traditionally, then the borehole gage is maintained, but the inserts wear excessively leading to frequent bit changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveborehole gage maintenanceVSAvoidheel insert life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The heel row is specifically designed with cutting elements optimized for gage maintenance rather than heavy cutting. These elements are positioned and configured to contact the borehole wall with minimal wear, allowing the heel inserts to maintain borehole gage while lasting longer than conventional designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If bit changes are frequent, then worn elements are replaced, but the drilling time and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting element performanceVSAvoiddrilling time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The multi-row cutting element structure distributes the cutting load across multiple elements that wear at different rates. While some elements may wear and need replacement, the other rows continue to function, allowing for more planned maintenance intervals and reducing the frequency of bit changes, thereby minimizing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The enhanced cutting element placement and configuration result in increased ROP and extended bit life, reducing drilling time and costs by minimizing wear and bit changes, while maintaining a consistent borehole diameter.

Implementation Method 1

The cutters roll and slide upon the bottom of the borehole as the bit is rotated, the cutters thereby engaging and disintegrating the formation material in its path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling motion:

Implementation Method 2

With weight applied to the drill string, the rotating drill bit engages the earthen formation and proceeds to form a borehole

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

drilling fluid which is pumped downwardly through the drill pipe and out of the bit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow:

Implementation Method 4

chips of formation material that are carried upward and out of the borehole by drilling fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 5

the cutting elements on the rotating cutters break up the formation to form the new borehole by a combination of gouging and scraping or chipping and crushing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGouging:

Implementation Method 6

The inserts in the heel surface contact the borehole wall with a sliding motion and thus generally may be described as scraping or reaming the borehole sidewall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScraping:

Implementation Method 7

the cutting elements on the rotating cutters break up the formation to form the new borehole by a combination of gouging and scraping or chipping and crushing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrushing:

Data Source

PatentUS9856701B2Rolling cone drill bit having high density cutting elements
Publication Date: 2018.01.02 SMITH INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US9856701B2 patent drawing
  • US9856701B2 patent drawing
  • US9856701B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rolling cone drill bit for drilling in earthen formations. In an embodiment, the drill bit comprises a plurality of rolling cone cutters. Each cone cutter includes a plurality of gage cutting elements, a first plurality of bottomhole cutting elements, and a second plurality of bottomhole cutter elements. Each of the first plurality of bottomhole cutting elements is staggered relative to the gage cutting elements on each cone cutter, and the profiles of the gage cutting elements and the first plurality of bottomhole cutting elements on each cone cutter overlap in rotated profile view. Each of the second plurality of bottomhole cutting elements is staggered relative to the first plurality of bottomhole cutting elements on at least one cone cutter, and the profiles of the first plurality of bottomhole cutting elements and the second plurality of bottomhole cutting elements on at least one cone cutter overlap in rotated profile view.