Staggered Pin Hinge System for Flush Vehicle Doors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hinge systems for doors and shutters in vehicles are aesthetically unappealing, mechanically complex, prone to environmental damage, and vulnerable to sabotage due to their exposed components, while flush systems fail to provide a watertight seal and are insecure.

Innovation Solution

A compact hinge system with a C-shaped connecting body and staggered pins, fully enclosed within the door and frame volume, ensuring a flush configuration and enhanced security, using a minimal number of components for reduced production costs and improved maintenance efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional hinge systems are used, then the door can be moved from closed to open configuration, but the hinge components are visible and exposed to environmental damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from environmental damageVSAvoidvisibility of hinge components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge system is nested within the door structure itself. The connecting body is received within a recess in the door, and the coupling elements are positioned within the door thickness, hiding all hinge components from external view while protecting them from environmental exposure. This nesting approach resolves the contradiction by making the hinge both invisible and protected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge system transitions from a two-dimensional surface-mounted configuration to a three-dimensional embedded configuration within the door volume. By utilizing the depth dimension of the door, the hinge components are positioned inside the door rather than on its surface, achieving both concealment and protection simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If traditional hinge systems are used, then the door can be moved, but the system requires numerous components increasing structural complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of componentsVSAvoidmechanical strength of hinge system
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple hinge functions are merged into a single integrated connecting body. The connecting body simultaneously provides the pivot axis, the mounting structure for coupling elements, and the structural link between door and frame. This consolidation reduces the component count from multiple separate parts to a unified structure, maintaining strength while reducing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The connecting body serves multiple functions: it acts as the pivot axis, provides structural support, enables rotational movement, and integrates the coupling elements. This multi-functionality allows a single component to replace what would traditionally require multiple separate parts, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If flush hinge systems are used, then the hinge is hidden, but the system cannot guarantee a watertight seal and is vulnerable to sabotage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater ingress and sabotageVSAvoidenclosure of hinge system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge system is nested within the door's internal volume, with the connecting body received in a recess and coupling elements positioned within the door thickness. This nesting creates a naturally enclosed space that prevents water ingress and blocks access for sabotage, achieving protection without requiring additional sealing components or complex enclosure structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Ease of operation

If exposed hinge components are used, then the system is functional, but the protruding parts create aerodynamic issues and safety hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamics and safetyVSAvoidprotection of hinge components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

All hinge components are nested within the door structure, with the connecting body in a recess and coupling elements inside the door thickness. This eliminates protruding parts that would create aerodynamic drag or safety hazards, while simultaneously protecting the hinge components from environmental damage and sabotage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentEP3497293B1Hinge system
Publication Date: 2022.12.21 SGUINZI PIETRO
  • EP3497293B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3497293B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3497293B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A hinge system (1) comprising at least a first coupling element (11a, 11b) operatively attached to a fixed frame (200) of the door (100) and at least a second coupling element (12a, 12b) operatively attached to a portion of the door (100), a connecting body (20) placed side by side and operatively connected to the first coupling element (11a, 11b) and the second coupling element (12a, 12b). The hinge system (1 ) comprises at least a first pin (30) extending along the first axis (X) and a second pin (40) extending along a second axis (Y). The first axis (X) and the second axis (Y) are staggered so as to be arranged at respective different distances (D1, D2) from a closing plane (F) defined by the door (100) and by the fixed frame (200) in a closed configuration of the door (100).