Staggered Electrical Switchgear Contacts for High Making Capacity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrical cut-off devices face issues with welding and erosion of contact zones due to the transformation of kinetic energy into deformation during contact closure, leading to potential device malfunction and reduced endurance, especially when handling short-circuit currents.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a staggered arrangement of moving contacts with time-shifted docking to minimize the presence and duration of electric arcs, with central and lateral contacts desynchronized by 100µs, reducing the intensity of peak current per contact and using an insulating carriage with differently sized housings to manage the actuation mechanism.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the movable contact is closed with high speed to ensure independent operation quality, then the closing power is improved, but the kinetic energy transforms into deformation causing welding and erosion of contact zones

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing powerVSAvoidcontact zone durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The movable contact is divided into multiple separate movable contacts (at least two) that close sequentially rather than simultaneously. This segmentation distributes the kinetic energy impact across multiple contacts and time instances, preventing excessive deformation and welding at any single contact zone while maintaining high overall closing power capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The closing action is made periodic through sequential closure of multiple movable contacts with different timing. Each contact closes at a different moment during the closing cycle, creating a periodic distribution of impact events rather than a single simultaneous impact, thereby reducing peak deformation and erosion at each contact zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Reliability

If the movable contact rebounds after docking to prevent welding, then the kinetic energy is dissipated through multiple bounces, but the electric arc produced during rebound causes local melting and erosion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding preventionVSAvoidelectric arc erosion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The rebound phenomenon is segmented and distributed across multiple movable contacts. Since each contact closes at a different time, the rebound events are also separated in time and space. This distribution reduces the intensity and concentration of electric arcs at any single location, minimizing local melting and erosion while still preventing welding through the rebound mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multiple movable contacts act as intermediaries that distribute and moderate the interaction between the actuation mechanism and the fixed contacts. By introducing these intermediate elements with different closing timings, the harmful concentrated effects of single-contact rebound are mitigated while preserving the beneficial welding-prevention aspect of rebound.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If sliding contacts are used with entry chamfer to differentiate docking zone from permanent contact zone, then the welding risk is reduced, but the closing power on short-circuit currents is limited by Laplace forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding risk reductionVSAvoidclosing power on short-circuit currents
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The contact system is segmented into multiple movable contacts that can be optimized for different functions. Some contacts can be designed with chamfered docking zones for low-speed closing to minimize welding risk, while the collective arrangement of multiple contacts provides the necessary closing power on short-circuit currents, overcoming the limitations of single sliding contact designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The contact system employs a composite approach combining multiple contact elements with different geometric features (chamfered surfaces, flat surfaces, different materials). This composite structure allows differentiation between docking zones and permanent contact zones across multiple contacts, reducing welding risk while collectively providing sufficient closing power to overcome Laplace forces during short-circuit conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Reliability

If pressure contacts with pads or rivets are used to prevent welding, then the welding risk is reduced, but the device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding preventionVSAvoidcontact zone structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding complex pads or rivets to single contacts, the solution segments the contact system into multiple simpler movable contacts. Each contact can have a relatively simple structure, but the collective arrangement achieves welding prevention through distributed impact and rebound mechanisms, avoiding the need for complex anti-welding components while reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the risk of welding and erosion, allowing for a high number of cycles while maintaining electrical contact quality, enhancing the device's endurance and preventing wear on lateral contacts.

Implementation Method 1

a movable contact (5) coupled to an actuation mechanism (6) controlled by the control module (2) to be moved between at least one triggered position in which the movable contact (5) is moved away from the pair of fixed contacts (4)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical energy transformation:

Implementation Method 2

When the moving contact comes into contact with the fixed contact, a shock ensues. The kinetic energy of the moving contact is transformed into deformation of the materials and a reversal of the speed having the effect of re-opening the moving contact, causing a rebound of the moving contact.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectKinetic energy transformation:

Implementation Method 3

During this reopening, an electric arc is produced which, depending on its intensity, will cause a local melting of the materials of the contact zones.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric arc: Electric Arc

Data Source

PatentEP2565890B1Electrical switchgear with high making capacity
Publication Date: 2017.03.29 SOCOMEC SPA
  • EP2565890B1 patent drawing
  • EP2565890B1 patent drawing
  • EP2565890B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The device has a central moving contact (5A) and lateral moving contacts (5B, 5C) associated with a pair of fixed contacts, where the moving contacts are parallel and offset in space with respect to each other to stagger in time approach of the moving contacts on the fixed contacts when closing an electrical circuit. The central moving contact is arranged ahead of the lateral moving contacts so that the central moving contact is the first to establish current when closing the electrical circuit and the last to interrupt current when opening the circuit.