Staggered Circumferential Groove Layout for Racing Tire Traction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Racing tires face challenges in achieving compatible dry and wet performance, with existing designs often compromising on traction and stability due to asymmetrical or non-uniform circumferential grooves.

Innovation Solution

A tire design featuring two circumferential grooves on either side of the equatorial plane, with groove portions arranged discontinuously and staggered in the tire circumferential direction, maintaining identical distances, widths, and lengths to enhance traction and stability during cornering in both directions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If circumferential grooves are made continuous in the tire circumferential direction, then wet performance is improved, but traction performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewet performanceVSAvoidtraction performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The circumferential grooves are divided into multiple discontinuous groove portions arranged in sequence along the tire circumferential direction. This segmentation allows the grooves to effectively channel water away (improving wet performance) while maintaining sufficient rubber contact area with the road surface (preserving traction performance).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If circumferential grooves are arranged asymmetrically with respect to the tire equatorial plane, then directional drainage is improved, but stability during bidirectional cornering deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrainage performanceVSAvoidstability during cornering
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The groove portions are arranged asymmetrically with respect to the tire equatorial plane, with different circumferential positions on the left and right sides. This asymmetric arrangement optimizes drainage in the primary driving direction while the staggered configuration ensures balanced performance during cornering in both left and right directions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The groove portions are arranged in a periodic staggered pattern around the tire circumference, creating a sequence of drainage channels that systematically guide water away from the contact patch. This periodic arrangement ensures consistent drainage performance across different rotation positions and cornering directions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Adaptability or versatility

If groove portions have non-uniform widths and lengths, then adaptation to varying road conditions is improved, but manufacturing precision and performance consistency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to road conditionsVSAvoidperformance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Different groove portions have different local characteristics including varying widths, lengths, and circumferential positions. This local variation allows each groove portion to optimize its function for specific regions of the contact patch, improving overall adaptability while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standardized geometric parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12064998B2Tire
Publication Date: 2024.08.20 THE YOKOHAMA RUBBER CO LTD
  • US12064998B2 patent drawing
  • US12064998B2 patent drawing
  • US12064998B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a tire, each of first and second circumferential grooves include groove portions arranged discontinuously in a row in a circumferential direction. The groove portions are arranged in a staggered manner in the circumferential direction. A distance D1 from an equatorial plane to a center line of the first circumferential groove and a distance D2 from the equatorial plane to a center line of the second circumferential groove satisfy 0.90≤D2/D1≤1.10. A maximum groove width W1 of the groove portion of the first circumferential groove and a maximum groove width W2 of the groove portion of the second circumferential groove satisfy 0.90≤W2/W1≤1.10. A maximum circumferential length L1 of the groove portion of the first circumferential groove and a maximum circumferential length L2 of the groove portion of the second circumferential groove satisfy 0.90≤L2/L1≤1.10.