Austenitic Stainless Steel Foil for Repeated-Bending Fatigue

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing austenitic stainless steel foils do not adequately address the need for enhanced fatigue strength, particularly in applications involving repeated bending stress, such as foldable smartphones.

Innovation Solution

Austenitic stainless steel foils with specific chemical compositions, including controlled levels of C, Si, Mn, P, S, Cr, Ni, N, and other elements, with a full width at half maximum (Fw) of a {111} plane in an X-ray diffraction profile greater than 0.366°, to enhance fatigue strength through increased dislocation density.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional austenitic stainless steel foils are used, then manufacturing and processing are straightforward, but fatigue strength under repeated bending stress is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the chemical composition parameters (C: 0.03-0.10%, Si: 0.10-2.00%, Mn: 0.10-2.00%, Cr: 16.00-20.00%, Ni: 6.00-10.50%, etc.) and processing parameters (cold rolling reduction ratio: 98% or more, final thickness: 100 μm or less) to achieve the desired fatigue strength while maintaining manufacturability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by controlling the size of inclusions to 7 μm or less before final product completion, and by subjecting the steel to repeated cold rolling and annealing processes in advance to control the total rolling reduction ratio to 98% or more, thereby pre-establishing the microstructure needed for high fatigue strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Length of moving object

If the foil thickness is reduced to 100 μm or less, then the foil becomes more suitable for electronic equipment applications, but the fatigue strength may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoil thicknessVSAvoidfatigue strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent simultaneously optimizes multiple parameters: reduces thickness to 100 μm or less while controlling chemical composition (particularly Cr: 16.00-20.00% and Ni: 6.00-10.50%) and processing parameters (rolling reduction ratio: 98% or more) to maintain fatigue strength despite the reduced thickness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite microstructure by controlling the phases present in the steel foil, specifically managing the austenitic phase along with controlled amounts of other phases through precise composition control and thermomechanical processing, resulting in a multi-phase microstructure that provides both thinness and fatigue resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If repeated cold rolling and annealing are performed to control rolling reduction ratio at 98% or more, then fatigue strength is improved, but manufacturing time and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing repeated cold rolling and annealing processes during the manufacturing stage to establish the desired microstructure and achieve 98% or more total rolling reduction ratio, so that the fatigue strength is built into the material structure before final product completion, reducing the need for additional post-processing steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the balance between processing intensity and time by controlling the total rolling reduction ratio parameter to 98% or more while managing the chemical composition parameters, achieving high fatigue strength through optimized parameter combinations that reduce the number of processing cycles needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The steel foils exhibit superior fatigue strength and durability under repeated bending stress, minimizing permanent deformation and extending the number of cycles before failure.

Implementation Method 1

in an X-ray diffraction profile obtained using CuKα radiation, a full width at half maximum Fw of a peak of a {111} plane is greater than 0.366°

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray diffraction: X-Ray

Data Source

PatentUS12428699B2Austenitic stainless steel foil
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 NIPPON STEEL CHEM & MATERIAL CO LTD
  • US12428699B2 patent drawing
  • US12428699B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An austenitic stainless steel foil according to this disclosure consists of, in mass %, C: 0.150% or less, Si: 1.00% or less, Mn: 2.00% or less, P: 0.045% or less, S: 0.0300% or less, Cr: 16.00 to 20.00%, Ni: 6.00 to 10.50%, N: 0.100% or less, Mo: 0 to 2.50%, Nb: 0 to 0.12%, V: 0 to 1.00%, Ta: 0 to 0.50%, Hf: 0 to 0.10%, Co: 0 to 0.50%, B: 0 to 0.0100%, Ca: 0 to 0.0200%, Mg: 0 to 0.0200%, rare earth metal: 0 to 0.0100%, Al: 0 to 0.010%, Ti: 0 to 0.500%, Zr: 0 to 0.100%, and Cu: 0 to 3.00%, with the balance being Fe and impurities. In an X-ray diffraction profile obtained using CuKα radiation, a full width at half maximum Fw of a peak of a {111} plane is greater than 0.366°.