Stakeholder Impact Discovery via Semantic Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies lack the capability to comprehensively discover stakeholders and impacts of product or service design changes, particularly hidden or indirect ones, which limits informed design decisions and regulatory optimization.

Innovation Solution

The development of stakeholder and impact discovery systems that utilize semantic web technologies and statistical machine learning to model relationships between products, people, and environments, allowing for the identification of both known and unknown stakeholders and impacts through data from various sources, including smart environments and sensors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If traditional data collection methods are used, then data gathering is simple, but stakeholder and impact discovery is incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestakeholder and impact discovery completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple data sources (smart environments, sensors, social media, online documents) into a unified stakeholder and impact discovery system. This integration allows the system to comprehensively identify both direct and indirect stakeholders and impacts by combining diverse data types through a centralized processing architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs multi-functional capabilities including data collection from various sources, stakeholder identification, impact analysis, and model maintenance. The platform serves multiple purposes: discovering known stakeholders, uncovering hidden stakeholders, quantifying impacts, and providing continuous model updates through a single integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive data from multiple sources is collected, then stakeholder and impact discovery is more accurate, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact measurement accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data processing workflow into distinct modules: data collection from multiple sources, data cleaning and normalization, stakeholder identification, impact quantification, and model maintenance. This segmentation allows each component to handle specific data types and processing tasks independently, reducing overall processing complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary processing layers including data normalization modules, stakeholder matching algorithms, and impact calculation frameworks. These intermediaries bridge the gap between raw data from diverse sources and the final impact assessment, simplifying the processing of complex multi-source data through standardized transformation layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If semantic web technologies and machine learning are used, then model accuracy improves, but computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary actions by pre-processing and storing data from smart environments and sensors before they are needed for impact analysis. Historical data is cleaned, normalized, and organized in advance, allowing the machine learning models to operate on pre-prepared data structures, which reduces real-time computational requirements while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial machine learning models that focus on the most critical stakeholder and impact relationships rather than attempting to analyze all possible data points. The models process only the essential features needed for accurate impact assessment, reducing computational resource consumption while maintaining sufficient model accuracy for effective decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Adaptability or versatility

If continuous model updates are implemented, then adaptability to real-world conditions improves, but system maintenance complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel adaptabilityVSAvoidmaintenance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous feedback mechanisms where data from smart environments and sensors is continuously collected and fed back into the models for updating and refinement. This feedback loop allows the system to automatically adapt to changing real-world conditions, stakeholder relationships, and impact patterns, improving model adaptability through continuous learning from actual usage data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service maintenance by automatically updating its own models using newly collected data without requiring constant human intervention. The machine learning components continuously refine their parameters based on incoming data, and the system self-calibrates its stakeholder and impact models, reducing maintenance complexity while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11727417B2Stakeholder and impact discovery
Publication Date: 2023.08.15 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • US11727417B2 patent drawing
  • US11727417B2 patent drawing
  • US11727417B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This specification relates to methods, and systems for stakeholder and impact discovery. One of the methods includes receiving a knowledge representation model indicating at least a first stakeholder and a first impact; determining an impact model based at least in part on the knowledge representation model; receiving distributed sensor data; and determining at least a second impact based at least in part on the impact model and the distributed sensor data.