Crack Detection in Metal Stamping via Indirect Die Strain Calculation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting cracks in metal stamped products during the stamping process are inadequate, as they fail to accurately measure strain in complex die geometries and cannot reliably predict fracture occurrences due to external disturbances and material variations.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that utilize a strain measuring unit to acquire and compare strain data from the punch and die over the entire stamping process, incorporating production conditions such as sliding speed, temperature, and material properties to judge crack occurrence by extracting reference data from a database of crack-free products and determining if the target data meets predetermined conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If strain sensors are installed in complex die geometries to measure die strain, then measurement capability is improved, but device complexity and measurement precision deteriorate due to geometric complexity and external disturbances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedie strain measurement accuracyVSAvoidsensor installation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary calculation approach: instead of directly measuring die strain through complex sensor installations, it measures punch displacement and workpiece reaction force, then calculates die strain through force equilibrium relationships. This mediator approach transforms an intractable direct measurement problem into a solvable indirect calculation problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical sensor-based measurement system with a calculation-based system using force equilibrium principles. By substituting physical strain sensors with computational methods based on measurable forces and displacements, it simplifies the measurement system while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If strain measurement is performed during stamping to detect cracks, then crack detection capability is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to external disturbance factors such as material strength variation and temperature changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack detection reliabilityVSAvoidexternal disturbance factors
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring punch displacement and reaction force during stamping, comparing actual measurements with expected values based on material properties and process parameters. This feedback mechanism allows real-time detection of anomalies indicating cracks while compensating for normal variations in material strength and temperature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the measurement parameters from direct die strain (susceptible to disturbances) to punch displacement and reaction force (more stable measurements). By measuring parameters that are less sensitive to external disturbances and using force equilibrium to derive die strain, it improves reliability under varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If traditional crack detection methods are used, then device simplicity is maintained, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inability to accurately detect cracks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical crack detection methods (such as visual inspection or post-processing examination) with a force-based detection system. By using reaction force measurements and displacement data combined with force equilibrium calculations, it achieves accurate crack detection during the stamping process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs crack detection preliminarily during the stamping process itself rather than after completion. By measuring reaction force and punch displacement in real-time and calculating die strain during forming, it detects cracks before they propagate further, enabling immediate process adjustment or product rejection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for precise detection of cracks in metal stamped products, improving the accuracy of fracture judgment and reducing the reliance on trial-and-error methods, thereby enhancing the quality control in metal stamping processes.

Implementation Method 1

In the process of stamping, in particular dies are applied with pressurizing force of a stamping press, reaction force due to deformation resistance of work and so forth, and cause elastic deformation. The elastic deformation of the dies is referred to as die strain.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2345488B1Metallic press-formed piece crack determining method, apparatus, program and recording medium
Publication Date: 2013.12.11 NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP
  • EP2345488B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2345488B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2345488B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In the process of target stamping for fracture judgment, an acquisition unit 101 acquires, as target data for fracture judgment, strain of a target die to be measured over the duration from the start time of stamping measured by strain measuring units 8 to the finishing time of stamping, and also acquires production conditions typically by measurement. An extraction unit 102 extracts the reference data, which gives the minimum total of differences between the production conditions of the reference data extracted from the storage unit 104 and the production conditions of the target data for fracture judgment, as the comparative data. A judging unit 103 compares strain in the comparative data extracted by the extraction unit 102 and strain in the target data for fracture judgment, and judges occurrence of a crack in a stamped product, if the maximum value of the difference is not smaller than a predetermined value. By virtue of this configuration, cracks possibly produced in the process of stamping of various metal materials such as those of iron-base, non-iron-base and stacked products may precisely be judged.