Social Topical Adaptive Networking System for Contextual Offer Personalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing social-topical adaptive networking systems struggle to accurately infer and present unsolicited group offers that are likely to be welcomed by users based on their current context, mood, and interests, often leading to unwanted advertisements.

Innovation Solution

The system utilizes a combination of Personal Emotion Expression Profiles (PEEP), Current Focus Indicators (CFi), and Current Voting Indicators (CVi) signals to infer user preferences and automatically sort and present group offers that align with the user's current context and interests, minimizing unwanted solicitations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the system presents unsolicited group offers to users, then potential user engagement and commercial opportunities increase, but user annoyance increases and user experience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser engagementVSAvoiduser annoyance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by tailoring offers to specific user contexts, emotions, and current focuses. Instead of generic mass marketing, each user receives personalized offers based on their PEEP (Personal Emotion Expression Profile), CFi (Current Focus Indicator), and CVi (Current Voting Indicator) signals. This localized approach ensures offers are relevant to the specific user's current state, increasing engagement while reducing annoyance from irrelevant advertisements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes offer parameters based on real-time user state parameters. By monitoring changes in user emotion (PEEP), current focus (CFi), and voting patterns (CVi), the system adjusts which offers are presented, when they are presented, and to which user groups. This dynamic parameter adjustment ensures offers align with user context, improving acceptance rates while minimizing unwanted solicitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the system accurately infers user preferences using multiple signals, then offer relevance and user satisfaction improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser preference inference accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by using a multi-functional signal processing framework that handles multiple types of user data (PEEP, CFi, CVi) through a unified inference engine. This same core infrastructure serves multiple purposes: inferring user preferences, determining optimal offer timing, identifying suitable user groups, and personalizing offer content. By making the system multi-functional, the patent avoids the need for separate complex systems for each function, thereby managing overall system complexity while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary components that mediate between raw user signals and offer generation. The PEEP, CFi, and CVi signals serve as intermediaries that translate complex user behavior into actionable insights. Additionally, the system uses intermediary processing layers that aggregate and interpret multiple signals before generating offers, simplifying the overall architecture by breaking down the complex inference task into manageable intermediate steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If the system presents offers based on real-time user context, then timeliness and relevance of offers improve, but processing requirements and system resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoffer timelinessVSAvoidsystem resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-processing and categorizing user signals (PEEP, CFi, CVi) as they are generated, preparing them for rapid offer matching. User profiles and preference patterns are pre-analyzed and stored in optimized formats, enabling quick retrieval and comparison when offer opportunities arise. This preliminary preparation reduces the computational burden during real-time offer presentation, maintaining timeliness while managing resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic resource allocation that adapts processing power to actual needs. Not all user interactions require full-depth analysis of all signals - the system dynamically adjusts the level of processing based on user activity type, time of day, and current system load. This dynamic approach ensures timely offer presentation for critical real-time contexts while reducing resource consumption during lower-priority interactions, balancing timeliness with energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11805091B1Social topical context adaptive network hosted system
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 RPX CORP
  • US11805091B1 patent drawing
  • US11805091B1 patent drawing
  • US11805091B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a Social-Topical Adaptive Networking (STAN) system that can inform users of cross-correlations between currently focused-upon topic or other nodes in a corresponding topic or other data-objects organizing space maintained by the system and various social entities monitored by the system. More specifically, one of the cross-correlations may be as between the top N now-hottest topics being focused-upon by a first social entity and amounts of focus ‘heat’ that other social entities (e.g., friends and family) are casting on the same topics in a relavant time period.