Standardized Product Evaluation System for Consistent Use Case Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating products prior to purchase lack standardization, leading to inconsistent creation and evaluation of use cases, and inadequate documentation for decision-making.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for demonstrating proof of concept that includes a requirements component, use case component, log component, and reporting component, enabling standardized creation, execution, and documentation of use cases to assess product performance and identify defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If product evaluation uses custom ad-hoc test methods, then flexibility in testing approaches is maintained, but consistency and reliability of evaluation results deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in testing approachesVSAvoidconsistency of evaluation results
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation process is segmented into distinct components: requirements definition, use case creation, test execution, and result documentation. Each component is handled by a dedicated system module (requirements component, use case component, execution component, reporting component), allowing flexibility in each segment while ensuring consistency through standardized interfaces and processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the evaluation process from unstructured ad-hoc testing to a parameterized standardized process. Use cases are defined with specific parameters (preconditions, postconditions, test steps, expected results), and the system enforces consistent application of these parameters across all evaluations, maintaining both flexibility in test design and consistency in execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If product evaluation lacks standardized documentation, then rapid informal assessment is possible, but decision-making quality and traceability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of assessmentVSAvoiddecision-making quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary structuring of evaluation data through standardized templates for requirements, use cases, and results documentation. This preliminary organization enables rapid assessment while ensuring all necessary information is captured systematically, preventing information loss and supporting informed decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback loops where test results are automatically documented, analyzed, and reported. The reporting component generates standardized evaluation reports that provide immediate feedback on product compliance with requirements, enabling quick decision-making while maintaining complete traceability of evaluation criteria and results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If manual product testing processes are used, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but evaluation thoroughness and defect detection capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of implementationVSAvoiddefect detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary automated evaluation layer between manual test design and actual product assessment. The use case component and execution component act as intermediaries that automatically manage test sequences, track results, and identify defects, enhancing detection capability while maintaining simplicity through standardized interfaces and automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS7509626B1Demonstrating proof of concept of a project with requirements component providing weights on importance and tracking with use cases
Publication Date: 2009.03.24 T MOBILE INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US7509626B1 patent drawing
  • US7509626B1 patent drawing
  • US7509626B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for demonstrating proof of concept of a project, such as a computer application, for an organization is provided. The system includes a requirements component, a use case component, a log component, and a reporting component. The requirements component maintains requirements of the organization for the project or computer application. The use case component maintains a plurality of use cases, each of the plurality of use cases are associated with at least one of the requirements. The log component track the results of the project or computer application's execution of at least some of the plurality of use cases. The log component is also operable to track at least some defects of the project identified based on executing some of the plurality of use cases. The reporting component is operable to report results for at least some of the use cases.