Standing X-Ray Scan Control for Dose and Bone Contrast

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing radiological imaging methods face challenges in reducing radiation dose while maintaining image quality, particularly in vertical scanning of standing patients, where the radiation dose needs to be adjusted based on patient thickness variations.

Innovation Solution

The method employs two orthogonal radiation sources that slide vertically to perform scanning, with current and voltage intensity modulations adjusted based on patient thickness and specific bone localization identified through scout views, to optimize radiation dose and image contrast.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual parameter selection based on visual evaluation is used, then operator control is maintained, but radiation dose optimization is insufficient and image quality varies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator controlVSAvoidradiation dose optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-evaluation by automatically analyzing scout view images to determine patient anatomy characteristics, thickness, and bone localization, eliminating the need for manual visual assessment while optimizing radiation parameters based on actual patient geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses scout view images as feedback to automatically adjust radiation parameters, creating a closed-loop control system where initial low-dose imaging informs subsequent optimized imaging parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Extent of automation

If static AEC dosimeter cell is used in 2D radiography, then automatic exposure control is achieved, but the method is incompatible with scanning radiography where exposure time is linked to scan speed and area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic exposure controlVSAvoidcompatibility with scanning system
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static AEC to dynamic parameter control, where radiation parameters are continuously adjusted along the scanning direction based on real-time analysis of patient anatomy variations at different positions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The scanning path is divided into multiple segments along the vertical direction, with each segment having independently optimized radiation parameters based on local patient thickness and anatomy identified through scout views

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If uniform radiation parameters are used for entire scan area, then system operation is simple, but radiation dose cannot be optimized for varying patient thickness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter control simplicityVSAvoidradiation dose
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different radiation parameters are applied to different regions along the scanning direction, with each region's parameters optimized according to local patient thickness and anatomy, achieving non-uniform dose distribution matched to patient geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Object-affected harmful factors

If radiation dose is reduced, then patient safety is improved, but image noise increases and image quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation doseVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes multiple radiation parameters including kV, mA, and filtration along the scanning direction to maintain optimal image quality at each position while minimizing overall dose, rather than using fixed parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces the global radiation dose while enhancing local image contrast, particularly for specific bone localizations, by modulating radiation intensity and energy in real-time, leading to improved image quality with reduced exposure.

Implementation Method 1

a radiation source with imaging direction along a vertical scanning direction, modulating a driving voltage intensity and a driving current intensity of the radiation source, both depending on a patient thickness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray emission: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

voltage intensity is modulated so as to adapt emitted radiation dose along the horizontal scanning direction or current intensity is modulated along the horizontal scanning direction so as to adapt emitted radiation dose, which is anyway very high, and at least fifty times higher than in vertical scanning of a standing patient, to the patient thickness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadiation attenuation: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS12207959B2Radiological imaging method
Publication Date: 2025.01.28 EOS IMAGING SA
  • US12207959B2 patent drawing
  • US12207959B2 patent drawing
  • US12207959B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A radiological imaging method including: 2 radiation sources with imaging directions orthogonal to each other, performing vertical scanning of a standing patient along a vertical scanning direction, wherein the radiological method includes at least one operating mode in which: a frontal scout view is made so as to identify a specific bone(s) localization within the frontal scout view, both driving current intensity and voltage intensity modulations of the frontal radiation source, depending on patient thickness and on the identified specific bone(s) localization along the vertical scanning direction, are performed simultaneously, preferably synchronously, and automatically, so as to improve a compromise between: lowering the global radiation dose received by a patient during the vertical scanning, and increasing the local image contrasts of the identified specific bone(s) localization at different imaging positions along the vertical scanning direction, for the frontal image.