Double-Threaded Standoff Fastener for Rotation-Stable Installation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing standoff fasteners for compound floor structures face issues with unwanted rotation during installation due to the location of the head portion, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs, as well as limitations in diameter, which restrict the strength and economic feasibility of the composite floor structure.

Innovation Solution

A standoff fastener design with a head portion positioned between the screw and standoff portions, featuring a key shape for torque transmission and a larger anchor nut diameter, allowing for improved control and installation speed while increasing the diameter without excessive cost, by placing the head portion internally and using a longer standoff portion with threads for enhanced grip.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the head portion is located on the end of the fastener to accept torque, then torque transmission is enabled, but the fastener rotates out of alignment during installation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque acceptanceVSAvoidalignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The head portion is inverted from the conventional end-location to an intermediate position between the screw portion and standoff portion. This inversion allows the drive axis to pass through the center of the head, eliminating the lever arm effect that caused rotation, while still enabling torque transmission through the key shape interface with the driver.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Strength

If the diameter of the fastener is increased to improve strength, then the structural strength increases, but the cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The fastener is segmented into three functional portions: a screw portion for engagement with the subfloor, a head portion for torque transmission, and a standoff portion with extended length and threads for concrete anchoring. This segmentation allows optimization of each portion independently, enabling increased effective diameter and length for strength without proportionally increasing overall material cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The standoff portion extends the functional diameter and length in the axial dimension rather than requiring a larger radial diameter. By making the standoff portion longer than the screw portion and adding threads along its length, the fastener achieves increased structural strength and concrete grip without the cubic cost increase associated with larger diameter solid fasteners.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If the head portion is positioned internally between screw and standoff portions, then rotation control improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation controlVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The head portion is merged with both the screw portion and standoff portion in an integral, monolithic structure. This merging eliminates the need for separate components, joints, or assembly steps, thereby reducing manufacturing complexity while achieving the reliability benefit of improved rotation control through the optimized head positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the installation efficiency and cost-effectiveness by minimizing unwanted rotation and allowing for a larger diameter standoff fastener, thereby increasing the strength and stability of the composite floor structure.

Implementation Method 1

the head portion having a key shape which is selected from a group consisting of lobular, splinular, and polygonal; the key shape capable of accepting torque from a driver oriented on drive axis of the fastener

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque transmission: Torque

Implementation Method 2

the standoff portion having a threaded segment, where a diameter of the standoff portion is less than or equal to a diameter of the head portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThreading engagement: Screw

Implementation Method 3

a thread-forming portion having lobes adapted to enable formation of threads into a metal structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThread forming: Plasticity

Implementation Method 4

the screw portion including a fluted lead end

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluted cutting: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11815123B2Double threaded standoff fastener
Publication Date: 2023.11.14 NUCOR CORP
  • US11815123B2 patent drawing
  • US11815123B2 patent drawing
  • US11815123B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Presently disclosed is a standoff fastener for use in a compound floor structure. The threaded fastener includes a threaded standoff portion designed to accept a nut which has a diameter larger than a head portion of the standoff fastener. The head portion is located centrally within the fastener in order to reduce a tendency of the fastener to pivot within a driver during the fastening process.