Staple Driving Passage Geometry to Prevent Driver Slip-Off

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Compressed-air-driven tackers experience unstable driving postures of U-shaped staples, leading to slipping off and potential damage to the workpiece due to the reaction force generated during ejection.

Innovation Solution

The driving tool features a driving passage with a head-guide surface and leg-guide grooves that guide the U-shaped driving member into an inclined posture, aligning the driver's movement direction with the staple's orientation to prevent slipping off and ensure stable ejection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a U-shaped staple is driven in a compressed-air-driven tacker, then the driving force is sufficient, but the driving posture becomes unstable causing the driver to slip off the staple head

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving forceVSAvoiddriving posture stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The driving passage is pre-configured with guide surfaces and grooves that establish the correct inclined posture of the staple before ejection. This preliminary positioning ensures the driver remains aligned with the staple head throughout the driving process, preventing slipping off while maintaining sufficient driving force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The guide surfaces and leg-guide grooves act as intermediary elements between the driver and the staple. These intermediaries constrain and guide the staple's movement, ensuring stable posture during ejection while allowing the driver to exert sufficient driving force on the staple head.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If the driver moves downward to eject the staple, then the ejection speed is high, but the reaction force causes the ejection port to deviate and the driver to hit the workpiece

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection speedVSAvoidworkpiece damage
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The driving passage is designed with an asymmetric inclined configuration where the staple is ejected at an angle rather than vertically. The tip end of the staple is deviated toward the front end surface side, creating an asymmetric ejection path that redirects the reaction force away from the workpiece, preventing damage while maintaining high ejection speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The ejection direction is changed from a purely vertical downward motion to an inclined three-dimensional trajectory. By introducing a horizontal component to the ejection vector through the inclined driving passage, the reaction force is distributed in multiple dimensions, preventing concentrated impact on the workpiece.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If the staple is ejected vertically downward, then the driving operation is simple, but the slipping off posture occurs frequently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving operation simplicityVSAvoiddriving operation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The inclined posture of the staple is predetermined by the geometry of the driving passage before the ejection action occurs. This preliminary configuration eliminates the need for complex real-time adjustments during operation, maintaining simplicity while ensuring reliable driver-staple alignment throughout the driving process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The tool ensures reliable and stable driving operations by maintaining the staple's posture, preventing slipping off and minimizing workpiece damage.

Implementation Method 1

a head-guide surface that is formed in the driving passage and that slidably guides the head of the driving member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a pair of leg-guide grooves, each of which is recessed from the head-guide surface toward a side of the first end surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNormal force: Force

Data Source

PatentUS12583087B2Driving tool
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 MAKITA CORP
  • US12583087B2 patent drawing
  • US12583087B2 patent drawing
  • US12583087B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driving tool includes a head-guide surface and a pair of leg-guide grooves, both are formed in a driving passage extending in a driving direction. The head-guide surface slidably guides a head of a U-shaped driving member. Each of the pair of leg-guide grooves is recessed from the head-guide surface toward a side of a first end surface of a tool main body. Legs of the driving member enter the leg-guide grooves. The driving member is driven in an inclined posture in which the legs enter the leg-guide groove, thereby avoiding a slipping off posture in which a driver is deviated from the driving member owing to a reaction force occurred when the driving member is driven by the driver.