Surgical Stapler Motor Pausing for Tissue Compression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing powered surgical staplers face challenges in achieving consistent stapling performance, particularly on thick tissue, due to variations in tissue dynamics and properties.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a software-driven pausing monitoring process that adjusts the motor speed of a powered surgical stapler. This process monitors the firing speed of the stapler and pauses the motor when a speed error threshold is exceeded, allowing for increased localized tissue compression and improved staple form.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the motor drives the firing assembly at a fixed high speed, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inconsistent staple form and tissue compression

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiring speedVSAvoidstaple form consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The motor speed is changed from a fixed constant to a dynamic variable that adjusts based on real-time feedback. The controller continuously monitors the actual speed and modifies the target speed profile during the firing stroke, transitioning from a static speed profile to a dynamic adaptive profile that responds to tissue characteristics and motor performance variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A closed-loop feedback system is implemented where the actual motor speed is continuously measured and compared against the target speed profile. The controller uses this feedback information to detect speed errors and adjust the target speed accordingly, creating a self-correcting system that maintains optimal firing conditions despite variations in tissue properties or motor performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If the motor speed is increased to complete the firing stroke faster, then loss of time is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to insufficient tissue compression

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiring stroke durationVSAvoidtissue compression quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The firing process is divided into distinct phases with different speed targets. The speed profile includes acceleration phases, steady-state phases, and deceleration phases, with periodic adjustments to target speed based on the firing progression. This periodic modulation of speed allows sufficient time for tissue compression at critical moments while maintaining overall efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The target speed parameter is dynamically changed during the firing stroke based on the detected actual speed and tissue response. The controller adjusts the target speed profile to extend or compress specific phases of the firing stroke, optimizing the balance between total firing time and localized compression quality at different positions along the firing path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If the motor operates without speed monitoring, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inability to compensate for speed variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system structureVSAvoidstaple formation consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

A feedback mechanism is integrated into the control system where sensors monitor actual motor speed and the controller processes this information to adjust the target speed profile. This feedback loop enables the system to detect and compensate for speed variations caused by tissue dynamics, motor load changes, or mechanical variations, thereby maintaining consistent staple formation without requiring overly complex hardware modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs self-adjustment by automatically modifying the target speed profile based on real-time performance data. The controller monitors its own output and autonomously corrects deviations from the desired firing characteristics, eliminating the need for external intervention or overly complex manual adjustment mechanisms while maintaining high manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250143701A1Motor control of surgical stapler with pausing in response to speed error
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL
  • US20250143701A1 patent drawing
  • US20250143701A1 patent drawing
  • US20250143701A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of driving a motor in a powered surgical stapler can include a pausing monitoring process that may be effective to improve staple form and/or increase localized compression of tissue. The pausing monitoring process monitors firing speed of a firing bar driving by the motor and pauses the motor when the firing speed passes a speed error threshold. Before pausing the motor, the pausing monitoring process may also require that a pulse width modulated (PWM) electrical signal driving the motor has a duty cycle over a duty cycle threshold while the firing speed is beyond the speed error. The pausing monitoring process may force the firing bar through a predetermined distance immediately after pausing. The pausing monitoring process may be limited in the number of pauses that can be taken during a firing stroke.