Starch Ester Release Coating for Recyclable Paper

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current release coatings, particularly those using silicone compounds, are not suitable for producing repulpable and recyclable paper products due to high production costs, toxicity, and environmental concerns, and existing starch ester-based solutions are also expensive and not entirely bio-based.

Innovation Solution

A release coating composition comprising a starch ester with a degree of substitution of 0.05 to 3, where the ester groups consist of fatty acids with a carbon chain length of at least 8 carbon atoms, combined with water and/or a plasticizer, and optionally a cross-linking agent, to provide bio-based and sustainable release properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If silicone compounds are used in release coatings, then suitable release characteristics are achieved, but the coatings are not suitable for repulping and recycling, and production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelease characteristicsVSAvoidrecyclability and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters by replacing silicone compounds with starch esters having specific degree of substitution (0.05-3) and fatty acid carbon chain lengths (≥8 carbons). This parameter change maintains release characteristics while enabling recyclability and reducing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite starch ester materials combining starch backbone with fatty acid ester groups. This composite structure provides both the release properties needed for adhesive separation and the biodegradability required for recycling, eliminating the need for toxic platinum catalysts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If synthetic polymers are used in release coatings, then release properties are achieved, but production costs become prohibitively expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelease propertiesVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive synthetic polymers with starch esters that can be produced at lower cost. The starch ester composition uses renewable agricultural resources and simpler synthesis pathways, reducing production costs while maintaining adequate release properties for the application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the degree of substitution and fatty acid chain length parameters to achieve the lowest possible production cost while maintaining functional performance. By controlling these parameters, the patent creates a cost-effective bio-based alternative to expensive synthetic polymers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If silicone compounds are cross-linked to improve film-forming properties, then suitable film properties and reduced component migration are achieved, but platinum catalysts are required which are costly and toxic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilm-forming properties and cohesive strengthVSAvoidtoxicity and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the potential harm of requiring toxic platinum catalysts into a benefit by using starch esters that can be processed without such catalysts. The esterification process uses milder conditions and non-toxic reagents, eliminating the harmful platinum catalyst while maintaining film-forming properties through the natural adhesive characteristics of starch esters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical processing parameters by avoiding platinum-catalyzed cross-linking. Instead, it uses controlled esterification with specific degree of substitution values (0.05-3) to achieve film-forming properties without requiring toxic catalysts, thereby eliminating harmful factors from the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-affected harmful factors

If existing starch ester-based release coatings are used, then bio-based alternatives are achieved, but production costs remain prohibitively expensive due to high levels of modification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental friendlinessVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the degree of substitution parameter to a specific range (0.05-3) that balances environmental friendliness with production cost. This optimized parameter range reduces the extent of modification required, thereby lowering production costs while maintaining adequate release properties and biodegradability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial modification (degree of substitution 0.05-3) rather than extensive modification of the starch structure. This partial action is sufficient to achieve the desired release properties and environmental benefits without the high costs associated with highly modified starch derivatives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10053593B2Coating composition comprising a fatty-acid starch ester
Publication Date: 2018.08.21 CARGILL INC

AI summary

A starch-based release coating composition and methods of making the same.