Starve Feeding Control for Radical Polymerization Temperature

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current controlled radical polymerization (CRP) processes, such as ATRP, face limitations in scalability due to high catalyst concentrations, exothermic reactions, and the need for precise temperature control, which increase costs and environmental impact, and hinder the production of high molecular weight polymers with narrow molecular weight distribution.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a 'starve feeding' method where the rate of addition of a reducing agent or radical initiator is continuously adjusted to control the concentration of activators and radicals, allowing for higher reaction temperatures, reduced solvent use, and automation of the polymerization process, thereby optimizing CRP processes like ATRP, ICAR, and RAFT.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If high catalyst concentrations are used in ATRP to maintain control over polymerization, then polymerization control is improved, but manufacturing cost and environmental impact increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolymerization controlVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the concentration parameter of the catalyst from high (conventional ATRP) to low (improved process), while maintaining polymerization control through optimized reaction conditions and controlled addition methods. This directly resolves the contradiction by demonstrating that lower catalyst concentrations can achieve the same control level with reduced cost and environmental impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs preliminary reduction of the metal catalyst to its active low oxidation state before initiating polymerization, and uses controlled addition of reducing agents during the reaction. This preliminary action ensures that the catalyst is in the correct active form from the start, maintaining control without requiring high catalyst concentrations throughout the reaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If precise temperature control is implemented to manage exothermic reactions, then reaction safety is improved, but process complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction safetyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic or controlled addition of reducing agents and initiators rather than continuous addition, which allows the exothermic reaction to proceed in controlled bursts. This periodic action prevents runaway reactions while avoiding the need for continuous complex temperature control systems, thus resolving the contradiction between safety and process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the exothermic nature of the polymerization reaction itself to drive the reduction of the metal catalyst and initiate polymerization, rather than requiring external heating or complex temperature control systems. The reaction is self-regulating through the controlled addition of reagents, reducing process complexity while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-generated harmful factors

If controlled addition of reducing agent is used to maintain low catalyst concentration, then environmental impact is reduced, but process control difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental impactVSAvoidprocess control difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by monitoring reaction progress (through conversion, molecular weight, or other parameters) and adjusting the addition rate of reducing agents accordingly. This feedback mechanism maintains low catalyst concentrations while compensating for variations in reaction rate, thus reducing environmental impact without making the process uncontrollably difficult.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary calculations and planning of the reducing agent addition schedule based on desired polymer properties and reaction kinetics. This preliminary action allows the complex controlled addition to be pre-programmed or pre-planned, reducing the operational difficulty during actual execution while maintaining low environmental impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If higher reaction temperatures are employed to increase polymerization rate, then productivity is improved, but control over molecular weight distribution deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolymerization rateVSAvoidmolecular weight distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary reduction of the metal catalyst to its active state before initiating monomer polymerization. This preliminary action creates a reservoir of active catalyst that can maintain control over molecular weight distribution even at higher temperatures, while the controlled addition of reducing agents during the reaction compensates for any loss of control, thus resolving the contradiction between productivity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic adjustment of the reducing agent addition rate during the polymerization process to match the increased reaction rate at higher temperatures. This dynamic control maintains the balance between active and dormant species, preserving molecular weight distribution control while allowing higher reaction temperatures for improved productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables high conversion rates (>90%) with reduced catalyst and initiator amounts, minimizing waste and energy use, while allowing for the production of high molecular weight polymers with narrow molecular weight distribution and improved safety and scalability.

Implementation Method 1

reacting the reducing agent with at least one of the transition metal catalyst in an oxidized state further comprising a radically transferable atom or group

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 2

controlled addition/activation of a radical initiator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDecomposition: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 3

controlled radical polymerization (CRP) processes for radically (co)polymerizable monomers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadical polymerization: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS11390696B2Control over controlled radical polymerization processes
Publication Date: 2022.07.19 PILOT POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11390696B2 patent drawing
  • US11390696B2 patent drawing
  • US11390696B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A procedure for improved temperature control in controlled radical polymerization processes is disclosed. The procedure is directed at controlling the concentration of the persistent radical in ATRP and NMP polymerizations procedures and the concentration of radicals in a RAFT polymerization process by feeding a reducing agent or radical precursor continuously or intermittently to the reaction medium through one of more ports.