State-Aware Buffer for Multi-State Object Data Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computer systems lack an efficient mechanism for managing multiple states of information from objects in a way that allows for seamless transitions and updates, particularly in business-related functionalities, where maintaining and comparing states is crucial but often not adequately addressed.

Innovation Solution

A state-aware and node-oriented buffer system is implemented, capable of maintaining multiple states of information and performing operations on these states, including comparing and updating them, while being generic to objects connected by composition associations, allowing for efficient data management and access without relying on specific node configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a traditional database storage mechanism is used, then data can be stored and accessed, but it cannot efficiently maintain multiple states of information or perform state-related operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to maintain multiple statesVSAvoidbuffer structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The buffer is segmented into multiple state containers, each holding a distinct state of object information. This segmentation allows the buffer to maintain multiple states simultaneously while providing structured access to each state through dedicated functions like beginBuffering(), write(), and compareStates().

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The buffer is designed as a universal state-aware structure that can handle multiple object types and perform multiple operations (reading, writing, comparing, transitioning between states) through a unified interface. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by providing versatile state management without requiring separate mechanisms for each operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If all nodes in an object are accessed together, then object integrity is maintained, but it prevents selective access to specific node instances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselective node accessVSAvoidobject integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The object is segmented into independent node instances that can be selectively accessed. The buffer's write() function accepts specific node instances rather than requiring the entire object, allowing selective access while maintaining the integrity of each individual node through structured validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The buffer acts as an intermediary between the executable logic and the object nodes. It provides a controlled interface that allows selective access to node instances while ensuring that operations on individual nodes maintain overall object integrity through the buffer's management layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If state transitions are manually managed, then flexibility is achieved, but it increases the complexity of state management operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate transition efficiencyVSAvoidstate management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The buffer provides self-service state management through automated functions. The compareStates() function automatically identifies differences between states, and the transition to new states is handled through structured write operations, reducing manual intervention while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The buffer implements feedback mechanisms where state changes are tracked and compared against previous states. The compareStates() function provides feedback on what has changed, allowing the system to automatically manage transitions while maintaining awareness of state evolution, thus reducing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If configuration is accessed at runtime, then flexibility is improved, but it increases processing overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration flexibilityVSAvoidruntime processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The buffer configuration is established in advance through the beginBuffering() function, which pre-configures the buffer for maintaining multiple states. This preliminary action prepares the buffer structure before runtime operations, allowing flexible state management without incurring configuration overhead during actual state operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20080278198A1Buffer for Object Information
Publication Date: 2008.11.13 SAP SE
  • US20080278198A1 patent drawing
  • US20080278198A1 patent drawing
  • US20080278198A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A buffer that is state-aware and/or node-oriented. In a state-aware buffer, one or more operations relating to a state can be performed. In a node-oriented buffer, instances of a node can be accessed without regard to an object structure in which the instance is included.