State Navigator for Autonomous Decision-Making

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machine learning technologies are inadequate for achieving efficient, robust, interpretable, and dependable operations and navigation in physical or data/state/decision spaces, particularly in autonomous systems, lacking in explainability and reliability.

Innovation Solution

The development of novel concepts, formulations, algorithms, and frameworks that enable state navigation by modeling intelligent systems as compositions of state components, using participation matrices and association strength measures to evaluate and navigate through state spaces, allowing for knowledgeable and autonomous decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current machine learning technologies are used for autonomous navigation, then the system can operate with existing tools, but the system lacks reliability, interpretability, and dependability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the state space into discrete states and transitions, breaking down complex navigation problems into manageable state transitions. This segmentation enables reliable tracking and interpretation of system behavior while maintaining manageable complexity through structured state representation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring current states, comparing them with target states, and adjusting transitions accordingly. This feedback loop enhances reliability through iterative refinement and provides interpretability by making the decision-making process observable and traceable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If complex algorithms are used to improve decision-making quality, then the system becomes more intelligent, but the system becomes less interpretable and explainable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making capabilityVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic programming to find optimal policies in state spaces, allowing adaptive decision-making while maintaining interpretability through the structured Bellman equations. The dynamic approach enables versatility in handling different navigation scenarios while the mathematical framework provides clear explanation of decision logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from continuous space navigation to discrete state space navigation, adding a dimensional transformation that simplifies the problem structure. This dimensionality change enables complex decision-making through discrete state transitions while maintaining interpretability through the explicit state-space representation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system navigates through complex state spaces, then the system can handle diverse scenarios, but the computational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescenario handling capabilityVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-computing value functions and policies for states that have been visited or are likely to be encountered. This preliminary computation stores information that can be quickly retrieved during actual navigation, enabling efficient handling of diverse scenarios without re-computing from scratch

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses model-based approaches where a simplified model of the environment is copied and used for planning and prediction. This copied model allows the system to simulate and evaluate potential actions without executing them in the real system, improving computational efficiency while maintaining versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20220245109A1Methods and systems for state navigation
Publication Date: 2022.08.04 HATAMI HANZA HAMID
  • US20220245109A1 patent drawing
  • US20220245109A1 patent drawing
  • US20220245109A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are given to build and enable systems to acquire knowledge from bodies of data in order to become capable of showing sane, rational, and credible behavior or output. Such systems includes software and/or hardware artifacts and/or stationary or mobile machines such as vehicles, robots, transportation systems, and in general systems with intelligent state-navigation capabilities. Aspects of this disclosure are to provide technical frame- works, methods, and systems to build artificially intelligent beings with explainability and interpretability.