Reinforcement Learning State Prediction for Adaptive Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional machine learning systems separately learn environment and planning models, resulting in mismatched models that are not well-suited for planning tasks, and require labeled training data, limiting their accuracy and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The Predictron system jointly learns environment and planning models using a state representation neural network, prediction neural network, and value prediction neural network, allowing for unsupervised training and adaptive planning steps, which generates accurate value functions and reduces computational resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional machine learning systems separately learn environment and planning models, then the learning process is simpler, but the models become mismatched and not well-suited for planning tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel suitability for planningVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the environment model and planning model into a single integrated neural network architecture. The shared layers learn common features from observations, while separate heads generate environment predictions and planning values. This merging ensures both models are trained jointly on the same data and objectives, eliminating the mismatch problem while maintaining reasonable architectural organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network is designed with universal shared layers that process observations and generate features used by both the environment model and planning model. This multi-functional design allows the same learned representations to serve dual purposes: predicting environmental dynamics and evaluating planning outcomes, ensuring consistency across both functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If conventional machine learning systems use labeled training data, then the models can be trained with available data, but the data requirements increase and training efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining efficiencyVSAvoidlabeled data requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs self-supervised learning where the model generates its own training signals through consistency objectives. The planning model predicts future states and rewards, and these predictions are used to create training targets without requiring external labeled data. The model learns from the structure of the planning task itself, making the training process self-sufficient and eliminating dependency on large labeled datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary unsupervised pre-training on raw observations to learn environmental dynamics and feature representations before fine-tuning on specific planning tasks. This two-stage approach allows the model to accumulate general knowledge from unlabeled data first, then adapt to specific tasks with minimal labeled examples, significantly reducing overall data requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional systems use fixed planning horizons, then the computation is more manageable, but the systems cannot adapt to varying task requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanning horizon flexibilityVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The planning horizon is implemented as a dynamic parameter that can be adjusted based on task requirements, state uncertainty, and computational resources available. The model can extend or truncate the planning horizon adaptively during execution, allowing flexible response to varying task demands while managing computational load through conditional early termination or variable-length trajectories.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12141677B2Environment prediction using reinforcement learning
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 GDM HOLDING LLC
  • US12141677B2 patent drawing
  • US12141677B2 patent drawing
  • US12141677B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for prediction of an outcome related to an environment. In one aspect, a system comprises a state representation neural network that is configured to: receive an observation characterizing a state of an environment being interacted with by an agent and process the observation to generate an internal state representation of the environment state; a prediction neural network that is configured to receive a current internal state representation of a current environment state and process the current internal state representation to generate a predicted subsequent state representation of a subsequent state of the environment and a predicted reward for the subsequent state; and a value prediction neural network that is configured to receive a current internal state representation of a current environment state and process the current internal state representation to generate a value prediction.