State Space Model for Joint Clinical Forecasting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning models for predicting patient health outcomes and clinical events struggle to provide actionable insights to clinicians, as they often fail to explain the reasoning behind predictions and how to act upon them.

Innovation Solution

A machine-learned state space model that simultaneously predicts physiological states and intervention suggestions, capable of outputting joint predictions of mortality risk, observation and intervention trajectories, and time-to-event predictions based on patterns in temporal progressions and correlations between past measurements and clinical interventions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple separate machine learning models are used for prediction, then prediction accuracy for specific outcomes is improved, but system complexity and computational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate prediction models into a single unified machine learning model that simultaneously predicts patient outcomes, clinical events, and generates actionable insights. This integration maintains comprehensive prediction capabilities while reducing system complexity by eliminating the need to manage and coordinate multiple independent models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The unified model performs multiple functions within a single system: it predicts patient health outcomes, forecasts clinical events, identifies actionable insights, and provides explanations for predictions. This multi-functional approach replaces what would traditionally require several specialized models, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If detailed prediction explanations are provided to clinicians, then ease of operation and decision-making are improved, but information processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of decision-makingVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The model pre-computes and stores explanation data structures during the prediction process, organizing information about prediction reasoning and actionable insights in advance. This preliminary organization of information allows clinicians to access detailed explanations quickly without requiring additional real-time computational processing, thus reducing the time loss while maintaining ease of decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If comprehensive patient data analysis is performed, then prediction reliability is improved, but memory usage and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidmemory usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and processes only the most relevant features and patterns from comprehensive patient data using the trained model, rather than analyzing all raw data in detail during prediction. This extraction approach maintains prediction reliability by focusing on critical indicators while significantly reducing memory usage and computational resource requirements during inference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12217144B2Machine-learned state space model for joint forecasting
Publication Date: 2025.02.04 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12217144B2 patent drawing
  • US12217144B2 patent drawing
  • US12217144B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A deep state space generative model is augmented with intervention prediction. The state space model provides a principled way to capture the interactions among observations, interventions, critical event occurrences, true states, and associated uncertainty. The state space model can include a discrete-time hazard rate model that provides flexible fitting of general survival time distributions. The state space model can output a joint prediction of event risk, observation and intervention trajectories based on patterns in temporal progressions, and correlations between past measurements and interventions.