Static Analysis Remediation Workflow for Monitored Cloud Deployments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack effective methods for real-time monitoring and remediation of security threats and anomalies in cloud environments, particularly in detecting insider threats and ensuring compliance with regulatory standards.

Innovation Solution

A data platform is deployed to monitor and analyze cloud environments using agents that collect and report data, generating polygraphs to identify anomalies and insider behaviors, with data processing resources performing real-time analysis and user interface resources providing insights for remediation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If static analysis is performed on code before deployment, then security vulnerabilities can be detected, but the system cannot respond to real-time threats and anomalies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity vulnerability detectionVSAvoidresponse time to threats
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs static analysis of code before deployment to identify security vulnerabilities in advance. This preliminary action ensures that vulnerabilities are detected and remediated before the code is deployed to production, preventing security issues from arising in the first place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous monitoring of deployed code and provides feedback about detected anomalies and threats. This feedback mechanism enables the system to respond to real-time security issues by alerting administrators and triggering remediation processes, thus closing the security monitoring loop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If continuous monitoring and real-time analysis are implemented, then security threats can be detected immediately, but system complexity and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time threat detectionVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is segmented into distinct functional components: agents deployed at individual code locations for local monitoring, a centralized analysis platform for processing data, and notification systems for alerting. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system architecture while maintaining real-time monitoring capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary analysis layer that sits between code deployment and production environments. This intermediary layer collects monitoring data from agents, performs initial analysis, and filters out false positives before alerting administrators. This mediator reduces the complexity of real-time response by pre-processing and contextualizing security events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If agents collect and report detailed data from cloud environments, then comprehensive security monitoring is achieved, but data processing requirements and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity monitoring accuracyVSAvoiddata volume processed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential security-relevant information from the vast amount of data collected by agents. By filtering and selecting only critical security events, anomaly indicators, and threat-related data, the system reduces the volume of information that needs to be processed and stored while maintaining comprehensive security monitoring accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Different levels of monitoring detail are applied to different parts of the system based on their security risk profiles. Critical components receive intensive monitoring with detailed data collection, while less critical components receive standardized monitoring. This local quality approach optimizes the balance between monitoring accuracy and data processing requirements for each specific context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12506762B1Leveraging information gathered using static analysis for remediating detected issues in a monitored deployment
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 FORTINET INC
  • US12506762B1 patent drawing
  • US12506762B1 patent drawing
  • US12506762B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Leveraging information gathered using static analysis for remediating detected issues in a monitored deployment, including: inspecting, using static code analysis, a non-executable representation of an application to identify one or more vulnerabilities in the application; detecting one more conditions in the monitored deployment; and initiating, based on information describing the one or more vulnerabilities in the application that were identified using static code analysis, a remediation workflow.