Static Analysis for Deep Learning Model Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing deep learning frameworks face challenges in optimizing deep neural networks for inference on edge devices with varying hardware resources and architectures, leading to difficulties in achieving efficient model deployment and execution.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a unified end-to-end system that uses static analysis with a hardware-based analytical cost model and a search algorithm to optimize deep neural networks for efficient inference on different hardware platforms, including CPUs and GPUs, without requiring real hardware for optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If dynamic profiled cost models are used to optimize deep neural networks, then optimization accuracy may improve, but compilation time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization accuracyVSAvoidcompilation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-computes and stores hardware profiled cost model data during system initialization or offline processing. This preliminary action allows the actual optimization to use pre-available data, reducing real-time computation requirements and speeding up compilation while maintaining accurate hardware-specific optimization guidance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If hardware-specific optimization is performed, then inference performance improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinference performanceVSAvoidoptimization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates hardware-specific optimization profiles by copying and adapting a general optimization framework to specific hardware architectures. Instead of building complex hardware-specific optimizers from scratch, the system copies the general framework and applies hardware-specific cost models and parameters, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining hardware-optimized performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains a unified optimization framework and achieves hardware-specific optimization by changing parameters such as cost model coefficients, hardware capabilities thresholds, and optimization targets. This parameter-based adaptation avoids the complexity of restructuring the entire optimization system for each hardware platform

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If real hardware is used for optimization, then optimization accuracy improves, but device resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization accuracyVSAvoidhardware resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces hardware emulators or simulated hardware models as intermediaries between the optimization system and actual physical hardware. These intermediaries provide accurate hardware-specific cost information and performance predictions without requiring direct access to real hardware, thereby maintaining optimization accuracy while reducing physical device resource consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates virtual copies of hardware characteristics through software-based hardware models and emulators. These copies replicate hardware behavior, cache hierarchies, and performance characteristics without requiring actual physical hardware, enabling accurate optimization through simulation rather than direct hardware execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive hardware support is implemented, then adaptability improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware platform coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a universal optimization framework that can handle multiple hardware architectures through a single unified codebase. The framework uses parameterizable cost models and configurable hardware capability detection to adapt to different platforms (CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs) without requiring separate optimization systems for each architecture, thereby improving adaptability while controlling complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic hardware capability detection and adaptive optimization selection. The system automatically detects target hardware characteristics at runtime and dynamically adjusts optimization parameters, cost models, and execution strategies accordingly. This dynamic adaptation enables comprehensive hardware support through a single flexible system rather than multiple static systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12293299B1Analytical model to optimize deep learning models
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12293299B1 patent drawing
  • US12293299B1 patent drawing
  • US12293299B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for optimizing and deploying deep neural network (CNN) machine learning models for inference using static analysis are described. A method includes obtaining a deep neural network (DNN) machine learning (ML) model, generating an intermediate representation for the ML model, the intermediate representation including one or more nodes corresponding to one or more operators utilized by the ML model, identifying, for at least one node of the intermediate representation, an optimized schedule for at least one operator corresponding to the at least one node using a static analysis that is based on a hardware-specific cost model, generating an optimized intermediate representation using the optimized schedule that is optimized for execution on a hardware platform, and generating code corresponding to the ML model based at least in part on the optimized intermediate representation, wherein the code is specific to the hardware platform.