Static Dynamic Content Delivery via Cache Server Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for static and dynamic content delivery on the internet face challenges in efficiently routing requests to the nearest data center and managing the combination of static and dynamic content, leading to suboptimal performance and increased latency.

Innovation Solution

A system that identifies the closest data center to the client and utilizes a cache server and shared hosting server within that data center to deliver static and dynamic content, with the cache server requesting updates to static content and fetching dynamic content from a shared hosting server, enabling efficient content delivery through caching and database lookups.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If content is delivered from a single centralized server, then content consistency is maintained, but latency increases and performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent delivery speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments content into static and dynamic components, and geographically distributes content delivery across multiple data centers. Each data center maintains local cache servers that store copies of content, allowing regional delivery without requiring a fully distributed complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The load balancer acts as an intermediary that receives client requests, determines the optimal data center based on client location and server load, and routes requests accordingly. This mediator layer simplifies the complexity by providing a single entry point while managing the distributed nature of the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If static and dynamic content are delivered separately through different systems, then content delivery flexibility is improved, but integration complexity and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent delivery flexibilityVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges static and dynamic content delivery into a unified architecture where both types of content are served from the same data centers through the same load balancing mechanism. The web server integrates both static file serving and dynamic content generation capabilities, eliminating the need for separate delivery systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The load balancer and data center infrastructure are designed to handle multiple types of content requests universally. The same routing logic and server architecture serve both static cached content and dynamically generated content, reducing integration complexity while maintaining flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of time

If content is cached at multiple data centers, then delivery latency is reduced, but maintaining cache consistency becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery latencyVSAvoidcontent consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-caching static content in multiple data centers before it is actually needed. The load balancer pre-determines which data center should serve which client based on geographic location, and content is proactively replicated to appropriate locations, reducing both latency and consistency challenges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of static content and distributes them to multiple data centers. Rather than attempting to maintain perfect real-time consistency across all nodes, the system accepts that cached copies may be slightly stale while still providing significant performance improvement, and uses the load balancer to manage which copies are served.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS8171161B2Static and dynamic content delivery
Publication Date: 2012.05.01 GO DADDY OPERATING CO LLC
  • US8171161B2 patent drawing
  • US8171161B2 patent drawing
  • US8171161B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods of the present invention provide for returning website content after being requested by a client. A dynamic component and a rewritten URL may be requested and a static component may be requested, which may be updated. The combination of static and dynamic website content may be returned to the client.