Static Mixer Cell Layout for Heat- and Corrosion-Resistant Mixing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mixing devices for fluid products face challenges such as complex and costly manufacturing, difficulty in assembly, reactivity with flow constituents, significant size, homogeneity issues, leakage, and limited resistance to extreme temperatures, particularly when used in applications like the food industry or nuclear industry.

Innovation Solution

A mixing device with staggered entry and exit points, multiple cells with internal and external partitions, and a design that allows for coaxial tubular casings to simplify manufacturing and reduce size, while maximizing fluid circulation path length and using materials resistant to corrosion and high temperatures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If helical blades are used for mixing, then mixing capability is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mixing device is divided into multiple discrete mixing cells arranged in series within the tube. Each cell contains simple internal elements rather than complex helical blades. This segmentation allows each cell to be manufactured separately using simpler processes while collectively achieving the desired mixing capability through cumulative effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple simple mixing cells are combined in series within a single tube structure to achieve the mixing function that would otherwise require complex helical blades. The combination of several simple elements produces the cumulative mixing effect needed for effective fluid blending.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If helical blades are used for mixing, then mixing capability is improved, but material reactivity issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing capabilityVSAvoidmaterial reactivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different mixing cells can be constructed from different materials selected to be chemically compatible with specific fluids they will handle. This allows optimization of material properties at each location based on the local chemical environment, preventing reactivity issues while maintaining mixing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If helical blades are used for mixing, then mixing capability is improved, but device size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing capabilityVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The mixing function is achieved by adding cells in the longitudinal dimension rather than increasing the size of individual mixing elements. Multiple compact cells arranged in series provide cumulative mixing action while maintaining a compact overall device footprint compared to large helical blade structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If helical blades are used for mixing, then mixing capability is improved, but temperature resistance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing capabilityVSAvoidtemperature resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The mixing cells are designed with simplified geometries that can be manufactured from high-temperature resistant materials such as ceramics or specialized alloys. The absence of complex helical blade structures allows selection of materials with higher melting points and thermal stability, enabling operation at extreme temperatures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Productivity

If complex mixing structures are used, then mixing capability is improved, but assembly difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing capabilityVSAvoidassembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The mixing device is divided into multiple discrete mixing cells that can be manufactured and tested independently before final assembly. This segmentation simplifies the assembly process compared to installing complex helical blades, as each cell is a self-contained unit that can be sequentially installed within the tube.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device enhances mixing efficiency and homogeneity, reduces manufacturing complexity and costs, and ensures durability across various temperature ranges, suitable for diverse industrial applications.

Implementation Method 1

The staggered entry and exit points of each cell maximize the circulation path of components within each cell. Furthermore, the sequential connection of the cells maximizes the circulation path throughout the entire dwelling.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCirculation: Convection

Implementation Method 2

At least one of the cells may include an obstacle-forming element, such as a ball bearing in the flow path of the first and second components. This allows for better homogenization of the first and second components.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentEP4297888B1Static mixer resistant to heat, corrosion and disintegration
Publication Date: 2026.02.11 AFFIVAL INC
  • EP4297888B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4297888B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4297888B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a mixer device comprising a recess including at least first and second adjacent mixing cells (2, 3), each cell (2, 3) including a fluid inlet opening (21, 31) and a fluid outlet opening (22, 32), the inlet opening being offset from the outlet opening such that the axis of the inlet opening is parallel to the axis of the outlet opening, the outlet opening of the first cell being connected to the inlet opening of the second cell by means of a connecting channel.