Static Mixer Blades for Industrial Spark Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional spark suppression systems for industrial processes are complex, expensive, and often incompatible with smaller-scale operations, leading to frequent filter media damage and maintenance issues due to the inability to effectively manage sparks in air handling and dust collection systems.

Innovation Solution

A static mixer or turbulator device with overlapping blades is installed in the air handling system ducts, utilizing thermo-fluid principles, momentum conservation, and turbulence to disrupt and extinguish sparks by separating them from their hot air bubbles and physically impacting them to prevent ignition and damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional spark detection and extinguishment systems are used, then fire threat is reduced, but system complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire threat reductionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the essential function of spark suppression by removing the complex detection and chemical extinguishment systems, retaining only the physical disruption mechanism through static mixer vanes that separate sparks from combustion gases without requiring additional chemicals or active detection components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The static mixer device performs spark suppression automatically through the natural flow of process air, using the kinetic energy and turbulence already present in the system to disrupt spark trajectories and separate them from hot gases, eliminating the need for external power sources, detection systems, or chemical agents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If conventional extinguishment systems using water deluge are applied, then spark suppression is achieved, but filtration system compatibility is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespark suppressionVSAvoidfiltration system compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention converts the potentially harmful effect of water deluge systems wetting filter media into a beneficial dry mechanical disruption method, where static mixer vanes physically separate sparks from hot gases through turbulence and flow disruption without introducing moisture that would damage filtration systems or require media replacement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If conventional spark suppression systems are installed, then spark management is improved, but operational cost and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespark managementVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The static mixer device uses simple, inexpensive vanes that can be manufactured from common materials and installed in existing ductwork without requiring expensive detection sensors, chemical storage systems, or complex control mechanisms, making it economically viable for both large and small-scale operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces complex mechanical systems with moving parts, electrical components, and chemical delivery mechanisms with a passive static mixer structure that relies on fluid dynamics and turbulence to achieve spark suppression, eliminating maintenance requirements for motors, sensors, and chemical systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Adaptability or versatility

If small-scale industrial processes are operated, then operational flexibility is maintained, but effective spark suppression capability is lost due to prohibitive costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidspark suppression capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The static mixer device serves multiple functions simultaneously: it disrupts spark trajectories, separates sparks from hot combustion gases, mixes process air to dilute combustible concentrations, and creates turbulence to enhance heat dissipation, providing comprehensive spark suppression capability for industrial processes of any scale without requiring size-specific system configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively suppresses sparks by rapidly cooling them to the surrounding air temperature, reducing the risk of fire and filter media damage, while being economical and easy to install, with lower energy costs and no moving parts, ensuring 100% spark detection and response.

Implementation Method 1

A static mixer or turbulator device with overlapping blades is installed in the air handling system ducts, utilizing thermo-fluid principles, momentum conservation, and turbulence to disrupt and extinguish sparks

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 2

A static mixer or turbulator device with overlapping blades is installed in the air handling system ducts, utilizing thermo-fluid principles, momentum conservation, and turbulence to disrupt and extinguish sparks

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMomentum conservation: Conservation of Momentum

Implementation Method 3

The solution effectively suppresses sparks by rapidly cooling them to the surrounding air temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS7416573B2Method and apparatus for suppressing sparks
Publication Date: 2008.08.26 BLENDER PRODUCTS INC
  • US7416573B2 patent drawing
  • US7416573B2 patent drawing
  • US7416573B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spark suppression device includes a plurality of blades or vanes that are mounted transversely in a duct of an air handling/dust collection system communicating with a spark source. A controlled flow of air carries sparks from the spark source through the spark suppression device. Sparks are suppressed by turbulence created in the airstream from the blades that have a downstream curvature. The turbulence strips away a hot air bubble surrounding a spark ember, thereby effectively cooling the spark and significantly reducing combustion at the spark ember. Other attributes of the invention contributing to spark suppression include an overlapping arrangement of the blades that results in high-velocity impact of the sparks against the blades, thereby breaking up the spark embers into smaller embers, and creation of rapid increased pressure within the spark suppression device that also helps to strip away the spark ember from the surrounding hot air bubble.