Static Runtime Scheduling for Unplannable ITL Workloads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing E-T-L processes struggle with unplannable workloads, particularly in I-T-L scenarios where source data is unknown and can be pushed at any time, frequency, or volume, leading to inefficiencies due to reserved processing capacity sitting idle or requiring excessive capacity.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize a static runtime to efficiently schedule unplannable workloads by employing an ingestion service that sorts and batches incoming data, a scheduler that generates work orders based on batch thresholds, and runtime instances that execute these work orders dynamically, optimizing resource utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If reserved processing capacity is maintained to handle unplannable I-T-L workloads, then system reliability is improved, but resource utilization deteriorates causing idle capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidresource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically provisions processing capacity based on actual workload arrival. Instead of maintaining static reserved capacity, the system activates processing resources only when data arrives in the buffer, allowing capacity to adapt dynamically between idle and active states, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and resource utilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A buffer is introduced as an intermediary component between data sources and processing systems. The buffer absorbs incoming data and allows processing to occur at optimized intervals, decoupling the reliability requirement (data preservation) from the resource utilization constraint (processing activation), enabling the system to maintain reliability without permanent reserved capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If large reserved processing capacity is allocated to handle multiple data types, then adaptability is improved, but cost increases due to excessive capacity requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata type handling capabilityVSAvoidprocessing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments processing capacity into specialized processing units, each optimized for specific data types or transformations. When a particular data type arrives, only the relevant processing unit is activated, providing adaptability for multiple data types while avoiding the need to maintain large reserved capacity for all possible types simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Processing units are designed with multi-functionality to handle various data types through configurable transformation rules. A single processing unit can be dynamically configured to process different data types, providing high adaptability without requiring separate dedicated capacity for each data type, thus reducing total capacity requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of time

If processing runs continuously on stand-by, then response time is improved, but operational cost increases due to idle capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous stand-by processing, the system employs periodic batch processing triggered by data accumulation in the buffer. Processing occurs in periodic batches when thresholds are met, eliminating the need for continuous idle operation while maintaining responsive processing capability, thus reducing operational costs without sacrificing response time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20250036454A1Schedule unplannable workload via static runtime
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 SAP SE
  • US20250036454A1 patent drawing
  • US20250036454A1 patent drawing
  • US20250036454A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are system, method, and computer program product embodiments for scheduling an unplannable workload via a static runtime. An ingestion service operating on a computing device establishes an inbound channel based on a setup order and associate the inbound channel to an Ingestion-Transformation-Load (ITL) task. The ingestion service stores incoming data received via the inbound channel in a staging area and organizes the incoming data into a plurality of batches. The ingestion service monitors the staging area to determine a number of unprocessed batches. Furthermore, in response to determining that the number of unprocessed batches meets or exceeds a first predetermined threshold, the ingestion service triggers a scheduler to generate a work order to be executed on runtime instance for each of the plurality of batches in the staging area.