Stationary Spindle Winder with Over Speed Nip for Bag Machines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bag machines with rotating turrets and single spindle winders are limited by complexity, speed, and compatibility with pneumatic devices, particularly unable to operate efficiently at higher speeds than 30 cpm and requiring servo-controlled devices for faster operations.

Innovation Solution

A winder with stationary spindles and an over speed nip system that includes adjustable over speed, elliptical orbit rods, and air nozzles for film direction, allowing for higher speed operation and easy air connections, capable of operating at 40 cpm with pneumatic devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a rotating turret with multiple spindles is used, then winding capacity is improved, but device complexity increases and compatibility with pneumatic devices deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewinding capacityVSAvoidmachine complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rotating turret is divided into multiple stationary spindles (first spindle, second spindle) that remain fixed in position. Each spindle operates independently without requiring rotation, simplifying the overall structure while maintaining multi-position winding capability. This segmentation eliminates the complex rotating mechanism while preserving the ability to wind at multiple locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of rotating the turret to bring spindles to the winding position, the invention inverts the approach by making spindles stationary and using a moving winder head or film path to bring the film to each spindle in sequence. This inversion eliminates the rotating turret mechanism entirely while achieving the same functional result of multi-position winding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a rotating turret is used, then multiple winding positions are achieved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to air connection difficulties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewinding positionsVSAvoidair connection ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The air connection system is segmented into separate, fixed connections for each stationary spindle. This allows each spindle to have its own dedicated air supply without requiring complex rotating couplings or flexible hoses, greatly simplifying operation and maintenance of pneumatic devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical rotation system is replaced with a stationary spindle arrangement controlled by pneumatic devices. This substitution eliminates the need for mechanical air connections that would require rotation, using instead fixed pneumatic connections that are much easier to operate and maintain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If a single fixed spindle is used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity deteriorates due to limited winding speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewinder structureVSAvoidwinding speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple stationary spindles are merged into a single winder system that shares common control, film handling, and support structures. This combination maintains structural simplicity while achieving higher productivity through parallel operation of multiple spindles, allowing simultaneous or alternating winding operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous operation by having multiple spindles ready to wind, eliminating idle time when one spindle is being changed or serviced. While one spindle is operating, another can be prepared or a roll can be removed and replaced, ensuring the winding process continues without interruption and maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Ease of operation

If stationary spindles are used, then ease of operation is improved with easy air connections, but adaptability to high speed operations deteriorates without servo control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair connection easeVSAvoidhigh speed compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Pneumatic devices are extensively used to control the stationary spindles, film divertors, and roll handling mechanisms. This pneumatic control system provides the speed and precision needed for high-speed operation (40 cpm and above) while maintaining the simplicity of stationary spindles with easy air connections, eliminating the need for complex servo mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables higher speed bag winding, reduced complexity, and improved compatibility with pneumatic devices, allowing for efficient operation at 40 cpm while maintaining ease of roll handling and inspection.

Implementation Method 1

an over speed nip system that includes adjustable over speed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

air nozzles for film direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP2366537B1Winder for a bag machine and a method of winding bags
Publication Date: 2012.12.12 CMD CORP
  • EP2366537B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2366537B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A winder (200) for a bag machine comprising an infeed nip defined between two infeed rollers (203,205), a first spindle (337), located along a first alternative film path, wherein after leaving the infeed nip the film can follow the first alternative film path nip to the first spindle to be wound about the first spindle, and a second spindle (338), located along a second alternative film path, wherein after leaving the infeed nip the film can follow the second alternative film path nip to the second spindle to be wound about the second spindle, wherein the winder further comprises an over speed nip defined between two over speed rollers (307,309), located along a film path, wherein the film moves from the infeed nip to the over speed nip, and then to one of the first and second alternative film paths.