Stationary X-ray Tomography Inspection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional X-ray inspection systems, particularly rotating gantry systems, are expensive, have a large footprint, consume high power, and are complex, making them inefficient for detecting threat materials and requiring significant maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A stationary X-ray inspection system with a multi-focus X-ray source having a non-circular geometry of X-ray source points and a detector array arranged in a similar geometry, allowing for efficient scanning with reduced power consumption and a smaller footprint, using regular line voltage and enabling faster data acquisition through electronic control of X-ray source points.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a rotating gantry system with multiple X-ray sources is used, then image quality and material discrimination are improved, but device complexity, footprint, and power consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the scanning task into two separate stages: a rapid low-resolution screening scan followed by a targeted high-resolution inspection scan only of suspicious regions. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high image quality where needed while maintaining simplicity and speed for routine screening, avoiding the need for continuously complex rotating gantry systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its operational mode based on screening results. The dual-stage approach allows transition from a simple rapid-scanning mode to a more complex focused inspection mode only when threats are detected, optimizing the balance between system complexity and image quality requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a rotating gantry system is used, then comprehensive volumetric scanning is achieved, but the system requires high power consumption and frequent maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning completenessVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic action by performing rapid low-power screening scans continuously, followed by intermittent high-power focused scans only when anomalies are detected. This periodic approach maintains scanning completeness while dramatically reducing average power consumption compared to continuous high-power rotating gantry operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and isolates only the regions of interest for detailed inspection, performing comprehensive scanning only where needed rather than continuously scanning the entire volume at high resolution. This extraction approach maintains reliability for threat detection while reducing overall power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If multiple X-ray sources are activated simultaneously to produce fan beams, then three-dimensional image reconstruction is improved, but manufacturing cost and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolume image reconstructionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the imaging process into two distinct phases: a first scan using a single X-ray source for rapid volumetric screening, and a second scan using multiple sources or higher power only for focused inspection of suspicious areas. This segmentation reduces manufacturing costs by avoiding the need for continuously operating complex multi-source systems while maintaining reconstruction quality when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters dynamically, using standard power levels for routine screening and increasing power or activating additional sources only when higher resolution reconstruction is required. This parameter adjustment approach maintains manufacturing simplicity while enabling high-quality reconstruction on demand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If the conveyor speed is increased to improve throughput, then productivity increases, but the scanning time per object decreases, potentially reducing detection accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning throughputVSAvoidthreat detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic action with two distinct scanning modes: a rapid first scan at high conveyor speed for throughput, followed by a second detailed scan at lower speed only for objects showing anomalies. This periodic approach maintains high productivity while ensuring detection accuracy is preserved for suspicious items through the slower second scan.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts conveyor speed based on screening results. High speed is maintained during routine screening to maximize throughput, then reduced only when detailed inspection is required, optimizing the balance between productivity and detection accuracy adaptively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves efficient threat detection with reduced operational costs and complexity, enabling faster image reconstruction and lower power usage while maintaining accurate material discrimination and image quality.

Implementation Method 1

a multi-focus X-ray source having a plurality of X-ray source points arranged in a non-circular geometry around a volume of inspection, wherein the sources emit X-ray beams having different beam angles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray emission: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

A detector array is positioned between the X-ray source and the volume of inspection, and a processor analyzes sinogram data and reconstructed image data of the object being inspected

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS10663616B2X-ray tomography inspection systems and methods
Publication Date: 2020.05.26 RAPISCAN SYST INC (US)
  • US10663616B2 patent drawing
  • US10663616B2 patent drawing
  • US10663616B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An X-ray inspection system for scanning items is provided. The system includes: a stationary X-ray source extending around a rectangular scanning volume, and defining multiple source points from which X-rays can be directed through the scanning volume; an X-ray detector array also extending around the rectangular scanning volume and arranged to detect X-rays from the source points which have passed through the scanning volume; a conveyor arranged to convey the items through the scanning volume; and at least one processor for processing the detected X-rays to produce scanning images of the items.