Stator Assembly With Axial Open-Closed Grooves for Eddy Loss Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing stator assemblies in electric machines suffer from high eddy current losses and instability due to open grooves, particularly in high-performance applications like electric vehicles, which also affect the stability and cooling efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A stator assembly design featuring open grooves at axial ends and closed grooves in the central region, combined with a collimator made of magnetically non-conductive plastic, enhances stability and reduces eddy currents while allowing direct cooling through the grooves.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If open grooves are used in the stator assembly, then cooling efficiency is improved, but eddy current losses increase and stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoideddy current losses
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different groove configurations to different axial regions of the stator assembly. The first and second axial regions (at the ends) have open grooves for cooling, while the third axial region (central region) has closed grooves to reduce eddy currents. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by optimizing each region for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The stator assembly is segmented into multiple axial regions with different groove characteristics. The grooves are divided into at least three groups along the axial direction, with different open/closed configurations. This segmentation allows simultaneous optimization of cooling (open grooves) and eddy current reduction (closed grooves) in different segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Temperature

If open grooves are used in the stator assembly, then cooling efficiency is improved, but stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Different axial regions are assigned different groove configurations tailored to their functional requirements. End regions use open grooves for cooling access, while the central region uses closed grooves for structural stability. This local quality approach resolves the stability-cooling contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The stator assembly is divided into multiple axial regions with differentiated groove structures. This segmentation allows the cooling function (open grooves) and stability function (closed grooves) to coexist in different parts of the same component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of energy

If closed grooves are used in the central region, then eddy current losses are reduced and stability is improved, but cooling efficiency may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeddy current lossesVSAvoidcooling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The central region is specifically designed with closed grooves to minimize eddy currents, while end regions maintain open grooves for cooling. This local quality differentiation ensures that the trade-off is acceptable overall because cooling is prioritized where it matters most (ends) while stability is prioritized in the center.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The groove structure is segmented axially with closed grooves in the central region and open grooves in end regions. This segmentation allows each region to be optimized for its primary function without completely compromising the other function in different parts of the assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration significantly reduces eddy current losses, improves stability, and enables effective cooling, making it suitable for high-performance electric machines.

Implementation Method 1

significantly reduces eddy current losses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy Currents: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 2

collimator made of magnetically non-conductive plastic

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS12580436B2Stator assembly for an electric machine
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 DR ING H C F PORSCHE AG
  • US12580436B2 patent drawing
  • US12580436B2 patent drawing
  • US12580436B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stator assembly for an electric machine, including a sheet metal package, a winding assembly, and a collimator. The sheet metal package includes sheets and extends between a first and second axial end. The sheets include grooves forming groove pockets in the sheet metal package. The winding assembly extends through the groove pockets, the groove pockets at least partially including a first plurality of grooves configured as open grooves in a first axial region provided at the first axial end, a second plurality of grooves configured as open grooves in a second axial region provided at the second axial end, and a third plurality of grooves in at least one third axial region, the at least one third axial region lying between the first axial region and the second axial region. The third plurality of grooves are configured as closed grooves.