Compressor Stator Vane Camber Profile Endwall Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional compressor stator vane designs experience inefficiencies due to weak flow near endwalls, leading to tip blockage and potential stall, as the pressure and velocity profiles are weak in these regions, and the existing camber designs do not adequately address these issues.

Innovation Solution

The compressor stator vane features a normalized camber profile that increases beyond 1.4 in the outer span region and includes a leading edge with dihedral angles between −20 and +25 degrees, enhancing endwall flow speed and pressure to reduce tip blockage and increase throttle margin.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional stator vane designs with moderate camber increases (≤1.4) are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but endwall flow remains weak causing tip blockage and reduced throttle margin

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrottle marginVSAvoidcamber profile complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing different camber profiles at different span locations. The endwall regions (inner and outer) have enhanced camber (≥1.4) to strengthen flow, while the midspan region maintains moderate camber (≤1.2). This localized differentiation addresses the specific problem of weak endwall flow without unnecessarily complicating the entire vane design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The vane span is segmented into three distinct regions: inner endwall region, midspan region, and outer endwall region. Each region has its own camber characteristics optimized for local flow conditions. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each zone to address the specific flow problems in endwall regions while maintaining simplicity in midspan areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Speed

If increased camber (≥1.4) is applied throughout the entire span, then endwall flow strength is maximized, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveendwall flow speedVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of applying high camber uniformly across the entire span, the patent applies enhanced camber (≥1.4) only to the endwall regions (inner and outer) where flow strengthening is most needed. The midspan region maintains moderate camber (≤1.2), reducing manufacturing complexity while still achieving the primary objective of strengthening endwall flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If weak flow conditions exist near endwalls, then tip blockage occurs and stall margin decreases, but the root cause is complex three-dimensional flow interaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestall marginVSAvoidflow field complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters (camber angle and dihedral angle) of the stator vane airfoil to modify the flow field characteristics. By adjusting these parameters, the design strengthens endwall flow and reduces tip blockage, thereby increasing stall margin. This parameter-based approach addresses the complex flow interaction problem through controlled geometric modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design improves the stall margin and extends the throttle range by strengthening endwall flow and reducing blockage, with analyses indicating over 5% improvement in throttle margin without compromising design point efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The compressor rotor blades carry a lift on the body of the airfoil that manifests itself as a higher static pressure on the pressure surface of the airfoil and a lower static pressure on the suction surface of the airfoil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

The pressure difference between pressure side and suction side of the airfoil drives flow through the tip gap of the compressor rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

This tip flow can roll up into a vortex, which tends to collect on the pressure side surface of the circumferentially adjacent blade

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex formation: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 4

The stator vanes must efficiently diffuse the flow and deliver it with proper velocities to the downstream rotors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 5

Flow in the end wall region is complex where boundary layers on the vane and flowpath surfaces come together

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBoundary layer: Boundary Layer

Data Source

PatentUS9074483B2High camber stator vane
Publication Date: 2015.07.07 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US9074483B2 patent drawing
  • US9074483B2 patent drawing
  • US9074483B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stator vane for a compressor is described. The stator vane has an airfoil root, an airfoil tip, a leading edge, a trailing edge, an inner span region, a midspan region and an outer span region, wherein the stator vane has a normalized camber profile that increases in the outer span region in a spanwise direction towards the tip and is more than 1.4 in the outer span region.