Status API Gateway for Electronic Messaging
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing network communication architectures for electronic messaging lack efficient mechanisms for selectively deploying system status messages across multiple front-end endpoints, leading to inconsistent and unreliable message delivery.
Innovation Solution
A method and system for electronic messaging using a network communications architecture, which involves receiving performance incident indications, determining incident statuses and messages, and updating front-end endpoints and public status pages with formatted messages through specific API calls, while considering geographic locations and application types.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If a centralized message deployment mechanism is implemented across multiple front-end endpoints, then message consistency and reliability are improved, but system complexity and deployment time increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces a status API gateway as an intermediary component that sits between the administration service and multiple front-end endpoints. This gateway receives status messages from the administration service, manages the deployment process, and distributes messages to appropriate endpoints. The gateway acts as a mediator that simplifies the overall system architecture by centralizing the deployment logic while maintaining reliable message delivery across diverse front-end systems.
Solution Approach 2:
The system is segmented into distinct functional components: the administration service that generates messages, the status API gateway that manages deployment, and multiple front-end endpoints that consume messages. This segmentation allows each component to be developed, maintained, and scaled independently, reducing system complexity while ensuring reliable message delivery through defined interfaces and protocols.
2Adaptability or versatility
If multiple front-end specific adapters are implemented to support different endpoint formats, then adaptability and message compatibility are improved, but device complexity and maintenance burden increase
Solution Approach 1:
The status API gateway is designed as a universal component that can adapt to multiple front-end endpoint types through a standardized interface. Rather than implementing separate adaptation logic for each endpoint, the gateway provides multi-functional capability to handle diverse message formats and protocols through a single unified system, reducing maintenance burden while maintaining broad adaptability.
Solution Approach 2:
Each front-end endpoint maintains its own specific formatting and protocol requirements locally, while the status API gateway provides the adaptation layer that translates between the standardized message format and endpoint-specific formats. This allows each endpoint to preserve its local qualities and requirements without increasing overall system complexity, as the adaptation is handled at the interface level.
3Loss of time
If real-time status message deployment is implemented across all front-ends, then information timeliness is improved, but network traffic and system resource consumption increase
Solution Approach 1:
The status API gateway performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and validating status messages before distribution to front-end endpoints. It prepares messages in advance with appropriate formatting and routing information, which reduces the processing time required at each endpoint and enables faster real-time deployment without proportionally increasing network resource consumption.
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements selective message deployment where the status API gateway determines which front-end endpoints receive specific status messages based on relevance and configuration. Rather than broadcasting all messages to all endpoints, the gateway applies partial action by sending only necessary messages to specific endpoints, reducing network traffic and resource consumption while maintaining real-time timeliness for affected systems.
Data Source
AI summary
Embodiments of the present disclosure enable electronic messaging using a network communications architecture, including receiving, by processor via a status application programming interface (API) of an administration service, a performance incident indication indicative of a performance incident associated with an application service. The administration service determines a performance incident status based at least in part on the performance incident indication and determines a message having a notification of the performance incident. The administration service determines front-ends associated with the application service. The administration service generates, using front-end specific adapters of the status API, a front-end specific API call to each front-end to update each front-end with the message with content and formatting specific to each front-end. The administration service generates, using a public status page specific adapter of the status API, public status page specific API call to public status page to update the public status page with the message.