Steam Cracker Coking Simulation Using Pressure-Loss Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is no effective method to determine coking in steam crackers, which affects steam cracker control, particularly distinguishing between pyrolytic and catalytic coking, and correlates with reactor tube aging and corrosion progression.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that records pressure loss and temperature profile, simulates and corrects coking based on these measurements, allowing precise determination of coking and aging of steam cracker reactor tubes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If steam cracking is stopped to free reactor tubes of coke by burning off, then coking is removed and reactor tubes are cleaned, but production is interrupted and energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor tube cleanlinessVSAvoidsteam cracking production
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing simulation calculations to determine the optimal decoking time point before critical pressure drop occurs. The system calculates pressure drop trends and predicts when decoking should be performed, allowing operators to schedule decoking proactively rather than reactively, thus minimizing production interruptions while maintaining reactor efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring pressure drop across reactor tubes and using this data to update simulation models. The system compares actual pressure drop measurements with simulated values to refine coking rate predictions, creating a closed-loop control system that optimizes decoking timing based on real-time reactor conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If more energy is supplied to heat reactor tubes, then cracking efficiency improves, but temperature resistance of reactor tubes is exceeded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecracking efficiencyVSAvoidreactor tube temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by using simulation to calculate optimal operating parameters including temperature profiles, pressure drop, and space velocity. The system determines the maximum allowable heating rate that stays within reactor tube temperature limits while maximizing cracking efficiency, dynamically adjusting parameters based on real-time conditions and predicted coking rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If coking is not monitored and optimized, then steam cracker control is difficult, but implementing monitoring increases system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteam cracker controlVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a simulation system that performs multiple functions: calculating pressure drop, determining coking rates, predicting decoking requirements, and optimizing operating parameters. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate monitoring and control systems into a single integrated software platform, reducing overall system complexity while providing comprehensive coking management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex physical monitoring instruments with computer-based simulation and calculation methods. Instead of installing additional sensors and physical measurement devices to detect coking, the system uses mathematical models that calculate coking rates from readily available process data (pressure drop, temperature, flow rates), substituting mechanical measurement systems with computational approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP4621032A1Computer-implemented method for dispensing the coking of a steam cracker
Publication Date: 2025.09.24 SCHMIDT CLEMENS GMBH & CO KG
  • EP4621032A1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1f
  • EP4621032A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4621032A1 patent drawingFigure 4a~5

AI summary

The invention relates to a computer-implemented method for outputting the coking of a steam cracker, characterized by the following steps: a. detecting a pressure loss of the steam cracker (100), b. defining a coking of the steam cracker (101), c. simulating a pressure loss of the steam cracker based on the coking (102) defined in step b., d. correcting the coking defined in step b. to adjust the pressure loss simulated in step c. to the pressure loss (103) detected in step a., e. outputting the coking (104) corrected in step d.