Steam Cracking Sulfur Additive Control for Low Carbon Disulfide

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional steam cracking processes for producing olefins produce carbon disulfide and other sulfur-containing impurities, leading to out-of-specification product streams and downstream process issues.

Innovation Solution

Introduce hydrogen sulfide gas to replace organosulfur compounds in the hydrocarbon cracking unit, reducing the formation of carbon disulfide and other sulfur impurities by maintaining a molar concentration of elemental sulfur between 10 ppm to 200 ppm.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of stationary object

If organosulfur compounds are introduced to passivate internal coil surfaces and reduce coke formation, then coil lifetime is improved, but carbon disulfide and sulfur impurities are generated causing product specification failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoil lifetimeVSAvoidcarbon disulfide formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical form of sulfur from organosulfur compounds to inorganic sulfur compounds (H2S, SO2, COS), fundamentally altering the chemical parameters of the passivation agent to eliminate carbon disulfide formation while maintaining coke reduction effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs easily handled liquid organosulfur compounds like DMDS that decompose to provide sulfur for passivation, replacing them with gaseous inorganic sulfur compounds that achieve the same passivation effect without generating harmful carbon-containing sulfur impurities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Quantity of substance

If organosulfur compounds are added to control carbon monoxide concentration, then CO concentration is improved, but sulfur impurities are produced affecting downstream processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon monoxide concentrationVSAvoiddownstream process operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the sulfur source from organic to inorganic compounds, altering the decomposition products to eliminate carbon-containing sulfur impurities while maintaining the ability to control CO concentration through sulfur-mediated reactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of substance

If dimethyl disulfide is used to reduce coke formation, then coke deposition is reduced, but product streams become out-of-specification due to sulfur impurities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoke depositionVSAvoidproduct specification compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent fundamentally changes the chemical composition parameter of the sulfur compound from organic (DMDS) to inorganic (H2S, SO2, COS), eliminating the carbon source that leads to carbon disulfide formation and thereby ensuring product specification compliance while maintaining coke reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces carbon disulfide concentration in pygas streams to less than 50 ppmw, preventing out-of-specification product streams and improving downstream process operation.

Implementation Method 1

organosulfur compounds, such as DMDS, undergo decomposition under the reaction conditions in the hydrocarbon cracking unit. The decomposition of these organosulfur compounds at the reaction conditions in the hydrocarbon cracking unit produces sulfur impurities, such as but not limited to carbon disulfide and methyl mercaptan

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDecomposition: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

sulfur in the form of organosulfur compounds, such as dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), dimethyl sulfide (DMS), diethyl disulfide (DEDS), diethyl sulfide (DES), methyl mercaptan (MM), or combinations thereof, are often introduced to the steam cracking unit to passivate the internal coil surface to reduce coke formation on the internal furnace coils

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPassivation: Deposition (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS12378168B2Methods for reducing formation of carbon disulfide in steam cracking processes to produce olefins
Publication Date: 2025.08.05 DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US12378168B2 patent drawing
  • US12378168B2 patent drawing
  • US12378168B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for producing olefins through hydrocarbon steam cracking include passing a hydrocarbon feed that includes one or more hydrocarbons to a hydrocarbon cracking unit and passing one or more sulfur-containing compounds to the hydrocarbon cracking unit. The sulfur-containing compounds include at least hydrogen sulfide gas, and a flow rate of the sulfur-containing compounds to the hydrocarbon cracking unit is sufficient to produce a molar concentration of elemental sulfur in the hydrocarbon cracking unit of from 10 ppm to 200 ppm. The methods include cracking the hydrocarbon feed in the hydrocarbon cracking unit to produce a cracker effluent and contacting the cracker effluent with a quench fluid in a quench unit to produce at least a cracked gas and a first pygas. The first pygas has a concentration of carbon disulfide less than 50 ppmw based on the total mass flow rate of the first pygas.