Steam Fracking via High-Energy Spark Initiator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hydraulic fracturing methods using high-pressure water pumps are costly, time-consuming, and pose safety risks, making them inefficient for smaller wells and increasing operating costs due to the need for repeated mechanical pump cycles to achieve sufficient pressure for fracturing oil or gas-bearing formations.

Innovation Solution

The use of high-energy spark initiators to create a high-pressure steam explosion within a horizontal borehole, generating live steam that fractures the formation, eliminating the need for expensive mechanical pumps and allowing for faster, safer, and more efficient fracturing by flooding the borehole with water and sand, and using a carbon fiber and ceramic spark initiator system to manage the electrical charge.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stress or pressure

If high-pressure water pumps are used for hydraulic fracturing, then sufficient pressure to fracture formations can be achieved, but the process becomes costly and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracturing pressureVSAvoidfracturing cycle speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical hydraulic pump system with an electrical spark initiation system. A high-energy electrical spark (100,000 to 1 million joules) is delivered through a spark initiator to instantly vaporize a small volume of fracking water, creating a steam explosion that generates the necessary fracturing pressure. This eliminates the need for expensive, slow mechanical pumps and enables faster fracturing cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the phase transition of water from liquid to steam. A small amount of fracking water is instantly vaporized by the high-energy electrical spark, creating a rapid phase change that generates a steam explosion. This phase transition produces the high-pressure shockwave needed for fracturing formations without requiring gradual pressure buildup from mechanical pumps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

2Stress or pressure

If mechanical pumps are used to build hydraulic pressure, then fracturing can be achieved, but the process requires repeated cycles with lengthy delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydraulic pressureVSAvoidpump cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the time-consuming mechanical pump system with an instantaneous electrical spark system. The spark initiator delivers a high-energy electrical discharge that instantly vaporizes water and creates a steam explosion, eliminating the need for repeated pump cycles and lengthy delays between fracturing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-positioning the spark initiator and fracking water in the borehole before the fracturing event. The spark initiator is lowered into the horizontal borehole and positioned at the desired depth, with fracking water already in place. When the electrical charge is delivered, the steam explosion occurs immediately, eliminating the need for gradual pressure buildup time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stress or pressure

If high-pressure hydraulic pumping is used, then fracturing can be achieved, but operating costs including insurance increase due to safety risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracturing pressureVSAvoidsafety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the hazardous high-pressure mechanical pumping system with a controlled electrical spark system. The spark initiator delivers a precise electrical charge that creates a contained steam explosion, eliminating the safety risks associated with high-pressure hydraulic pumping equipment, hoses, and connections that require expensive insurance coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The spark initiator functions as a disposable or single-use device that is lowered into the borehole, activated, and then abandoned in the formation. This eliminates the need for expensive, safety-critical mechanical pumping equipment that requires maintenance, inspection, and insurance. The simple electrical spark system with carbon electrodes and ceramic insulator is far safer and less costly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Ease of manufacture

If hydraulic water pump fracking is used, then formations can be fractured, but the cost makes smaller well production not cost effective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracturing effectivenessVSAvoidcost-effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the expensive mechanical hydraulic pump system with a low-cost electrical spark system. The spark initiator uses simple components (carbon electrodes, ceramic insulator, electrical wiring) that are far cheaper than high-pressure pumping equipment. This cost reduction makes fracturing smaller, lower-production wells economically viable, expanding the range of cost-effective oil and gas development.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method reduces costs and operating time, achieves higher pressure and more extensive fracturing, making the process safer and more economically viable for smaller wells, and allows for the fracturing of formations previously inaccessible due to mechanical pump pressure limitations.

Implementation Method 1

A high-energy electric charge may be sent to the spark initiator in the range of approximately 100,000 to 1 million joules. The voltage may be sparked across the positive and negative contacts on the spark initiator (like a spark plug), which creates a high-pressure steam explosion caused by the heat of the initiator spark.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSteam explosion: Steam Explosion

Implementation Method 2

This may heat the water in the borehole near the initiator into very high-pressure live steam.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS12065918B2Systems and methods for steam fracking
Publication Date: 2024.08.20 JOSHUA R&DTECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US12065918B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for steam fracking may provide for fracking at a lower cost, providing faster cycles, higher pressure, and more perforation, thereby making a safer system and less expensive method. A high-energy spark initiator may be maneuvered into a horizontal drill hole where a petroleum-bearing formation is fractured for trapped petroleum to flow out through cracks and into the horizontal borehole and pumped to the surface for collection. The horizontal borehole may be flooded with slickwater which may submerge the spark initiator. A high-energy electric charge may be sparked across the contacts on the spark initiator, followed by a high energy steam explosion caused by the heat of the spark. This may heat the water in the borehole near the initiator into high-pressure live steam which forces slickwater into the formation's cracks, opening the cracks wider where the slickwater sand will pack into cracks to hold them open.