High-Pressure Steam Heat Transfer in Polyester Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high cost and inefficiency of using low-vapor-pressure organic heat-transfer fluids in polyester production facilities, due to their low sensible heat capacity, flammability, and thermal instability, necessitate a more economical and effective thermal energy transfer method.

Innovation Solution

Employing high-pressure steam as the principal heat-transfer fluid, utilizing small diameter, elongated heat-exchange conduits and shell-and-tube exchangers with high-pressure steam on the shell-side and process materials on the tube-side, to enhance heat transfer rates and reduce capital costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If low-vapor-pressure organic heat-transfer fluids are used, then thermal energy can be transferred to process materials, but the heat transfer efficiency is low due to low sensible heat capacity and latent heat of vaporization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer efficiencyVSAvoidmass flow rate required
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the heat-transfer fluid by using steam instead of organic fluids. Steam has significantly higher sensible heat capacity and latent heat of vaporization, allowing the same thermal energy to be transferred with much lower mass flow rates, thereby resolving the contradiction between heat transfer efficiency and quantity of substance required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs steam as a heat-transfer fluid that can be continuously generated and condensed, replacing expensive organic fluids. The steam condenses to water after heat transfer and can be reused or easily replaced, providing a cost-effective solution that improves heat transfer efficiency without requiring large quantities of expensive fluid inventory.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If low-vapor-pressure organic heat-transfer fluids are used, then thermal energy transfer is enabled, but flammability and thermal instability create safety hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidflammability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces flammable organic heat-transfer fluids with steam, which is inherently non-flammable and thermally stable. Steam can be continuously generated and condensed without safety concerns related to flammability, directly resolving the contradiction between reliability and harmful factors generated by the heat-transfer fluid.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates an inert thermal environment by using steam instead of flammable organic fluids. Steam provides a safe, non-reactive heat-transfer medium that eliminates fire hazards and thermal degradation issues, ensuring reliable operation without generating harmful factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

3Quantity of substance

If large diameter conduits are used to convey heat-transfer fluid, then sufficient mass flow rate is achieved, but capital cost for piping and mechanical design increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass flow rateVSAvoidcapital cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the heat-transfer fluid from organic material to steam, which has superior heat transfer properties. This allows the use of smaller diameter conduits to achieve the same thermal energy transfer, significantly reducing capital costs for piping and mechanical design while maintaining sufficient mass flow rate for heat transfer requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of energy

If large heat-transfer areas are used, then sufficient thermal energy exchange is achieved, but mechanical design complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal energy exchangeVSAvoidheat-exchange boundary surface area
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the heat-transfer medium to steam, which provides much higher heat transfer coefficients due to its superior sensible and latent heat properties. This enables the same thermal energy exchange to be achieved with significantly smaller heat-transfer areas, reducing mechanical design complexity and associated costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the required boundary surface area, increases heat transfer efficiency, and lowers operational costs by using steam to provide up to 80% of the total thermal energy input, while minimizing mechanical design complexities and safety concerns.

Implementation Method 1

heating at least a portion of the reaction medium via indirect heat exchange with high-pressure steam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

the heating causes at least a portion of the high-pressure steam to condense

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 3

flashing at least a portion of the pressurized condensed water to thereby produce lower-pressure steam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlashing: Flash Evaporation

Implementation Method 4

heating one or more process fluid streams of the polyester production facility via indirect heat exchange with at least a portion of the lower-pressure steam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS8202962B2Integrated steam heating in polyester production process
Publication Date: 2012.06.19 ALPEK POLYESTER SA DE CV
  • US8202962B2 patent drawing
  • US8202962B2 patent drawing
  • US8202962B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Processes for making polyesters in a polyester production facility are disclosed, that include the steps of: forming a reaction medium comprising at least one monomer that includes terephthalic acid (TPA) and/or an ester derivative of TPA; subjecting at least a portion of the reaction medium to one or more chemical reactions in the polyester production facility to thereby produce the polyester; heating at least a portion of the reaction medium via indirect heat exchange with high-pressure steam, wherein the heating causes at least a portion of the high-pressure steam to condense and thereby provide pressurized condensed water; flashing at least a portion of the pressurized condensed water to thereby produce lower-pressure steam; and heating one or more process fluid streams of the polyester production facility via indirect heat exchange with at least a portion of the lower-pressure steam, wherein the process fluid streams include any stream that is formed predominately of the reaction medium and/or the at least one monomer.