Multi-variable Steam Temperature Control for Boiler Stress Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current boiler control systems, particularly in steam generating systems, face challenges in precisely controlling short-term fluctuations in steam temperature, leading to stress on the system and reduced component lifespan due to reactionary control responses and cross-path interference in cascaded PID controllers.

Innovation Solution

A multi-variable controller, such as a multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) controller, is implemented to manage temperature control across split fluid flow paths, using a process model to coordinate control objectives and a feedback tracking mechanism to adjust for manual mode conditions, thereby minimizing cross-loop interactions and ensuring stable temperature control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cascaded PID controllers are used for steam temperature control, then basic temperature regulation is achieved, but short-term fluctuations cannot be controlled precisely and reactionary control responses cause stress on system components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent lifespanVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into multiple independent control loops, each managing specific steam temperature parameters at different locations (e.g., intermediate superheater outlet, final superheater outlet). This segmentation allows precise control of short-term fluctuations in each section without requiring the entire system to react simultaneously, reducing stress on components while maintaining control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system implements predictive control by anticipating steam temperature changes before they occur. By monitoring leading indicators such as fuel flow rate changes, feedwater flow rate changes, and steam pressure trends, the controller takes preliminary actions to counteract expected temperature deviations, eliminating reactionary responses that cause thermal stress on boiler components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple control objectives are implemented simultaneously, then comprehensive temperature control is achieved, but cross-path interference occurs in cascaded PID controllers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature control precisionVSAvoidcontroller structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple control objectives are merged into a unified control framework where a single advanced controller coordinates all temperature control actions. This integration eliminates cross-path interference that occurs in cascaded PID controllers by centralizing the decision-making process, achieving precise temperature control without requiring complex inter-connected controller structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary control layer is introduced that coordinates between different control objectives and actuators. This intermediary process manages the interactions between fuel flow control, feedwater flow control, and spray water control, preventing cross-path interference while maintaining precise temperature control across multiple sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If control valves are placed in manual mode for maintenance or adjustment, then operational flexibility is improved, but the controller cannot achieve optimal control performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidcontrol performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adapts its structure and objectives based on the operational mode of control valves. When a valve is placed in manual mode, the controller automatically detects this condition and reconfigures by removing or adjusting the corresponding control objective, maintaining optimal performance with the remaining automatic valves while preserving operational flexibility for maintenance and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10240775B2Multi-objective steam temperature control
Publication Date: 2019.03.26 EMERSON PROCESS MANAGEMENT POWER & WATER SOLUTIONS INC
  • US10240775B2 patent drawing
  • US10240775B2 patent drawing
  • US10240775B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system for controlling a steam turbine power plant having multiple steam flow paths that converge to a combined steam path controls the final steam temperature of the steam input into the turbine by controlling one or more temperature control devices in each of the steam flow paths. The control system includes a multivariable controller, such as a multi-input/multi-output (MIMO) controller, that produces two control signals that control each of a set of downstream control valves in the split steam flow paths. The controller receives two inputs in the form of measured or calculated process variables including the final steam temperature and the inter-stage temperature difference between the steam being produced in each of the two split steam paths and performs multi-objective control based on these inputs. However, when one of the downstream control valves is placed into a manual mode, the controller shifts to being a single objective controller to control the final steam temperature of the system and to thereby perform better or more optimal control.