Electronic Steam Trap Control for Accurate Condensate Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing steam traps are purely mechanical, facing challenges in differentiating between condensed steam and water, efficiently removing condensate at varying load conditions, and lack telemetry or external monitoring, leading to maintenance issues and potential safety hazards.

Innovation Solution

Integration of electronic components such as processors, electronic water sensors, and actuatable valves in steam traps, enabling remote monitoring and status notification, with power provided by Thermoelectric Generators (TEGs), and data transmission to a centralized information handling system for comprehensive analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If purely mechanical means (floats, pressure) are used to detect water presence, then the device structure remains simple, but the ability to differentiate between condensed steam and water is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater detection accuracyVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical detection systems (floats, pressure sensors) with electronic water sensors that use electrical conductivity measurements to detect water presence. This substitution enables more accurate differentiation between water and condensed steam while maintaining relatively simple device architecture through electronic rather than mechanical means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary electronic sensing mechanism that measures electrical conductivity as a mediating property to indirectly detect water presence. This intermediary approach allows accurate water detection without direct mechanical contact or complex mechanical structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If purely mechanical steam traps are used, then the device is simpler, but there is no telemetry or external monitoring capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring capabilityVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where electronic sensors continuously monitor water presence and operational status, transmitting this information back to a central control system. This feedback loop enables real-time monitoring and telemetry without significantly complicating the basic steam trap function, as the monitoring components are added as separate electronic modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If electronic components are integrated into steam traps, then monitoring and reliability improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteam trap operationVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where the electronic components automatically monitor and control the steam trap operation without requiring external mechanical intervention. The electronic control system self-regulates the valve based on sensor input, improving reliability by eliminating the need for manual adjustment or complex mechanical linkages while keeping the overall device structure manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If mechanical means are used to remove condensate, then the device is simpler, but efficiency at varying load conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecondensate removal efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic control mechanisms where the electronically actuatable valve can adjust its opening degree and response characteristics based on real-time sensor feedback and varying load conditions. This dynamic adjustment capability enables efficient condensate removal across different operating conditions while keeping the physical device structure relatively simple through electronic control rather than complex mechanical linkages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances reliability and efficiency by accurately detecting condensate, reducing maintenance needs, and providing real-time monitoring and feedback, thereby improving safety and operational efficiency of steam systems.

Implementation Method 1

an electronic water sensor configured to determine a presence of water in the steam trap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conductivity detection: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

The processor may be configured to transmit, via the network interface, telemetry data regarding physical parameters measured by the respective electronic water sensor to the centralized information handling system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical signal transmission: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12455043B2Steam trap
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 IMPERIUM TECH
  • US12455043B2 patent drawing
  • US12455043B2 patent drawing
  • US12455043B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A steam trap may include a processor and an electronic water sensor configured to determine a presence of water in the steam trap and transmit data regarding the presence of the water to the processor. The steam trap may further include an electronically actuatable valve configured to be driven by signals from the processor.