Battery-Less Steam Trap Monitoring for Reliable Fault Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Steam systems face inefficiencies and potential damage due to condensate accumulation and non-condensable gases, and existing steam trap monitors are unreliable and require frequent battery maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A battery-less steam trap monitoring system that uses environmental energy harvesting and advanced data processing techniques to determine the state of steam traps, including temperature analysis and energy management, enabling reliable fault detection and reducing maintenance needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If battery-powered electronic steam trap monitors are used to automatically monitor steam trap parameters, then manual inspection costs are reduced, but the monitors require periodic battery inspection and replacement which defeats the purpose of automation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of steam trap monitoringVSAvoidtime for battery inspection and replacement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring device harvests energy from the steam trap's thermal environment through thermoelectric generators and vibrational energy through piezoelectric elements, enabling the device to power itself without external battery replacement. The device serves itself by converting ambient energy into electrical power for its operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The device changes its power source from chemical energy (batteries) to physical energy conversion (thermal and vibrational energy harvesting). By changing the energy parameter from stored chemical energy to continuously harvested environmental energy, the device eliminates battery replacement requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If manual inspection of steam traps is performed, then fault detection can be conducted, but inspection costs increase and become impractical for facilities with hundreds or thousands of steam traps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidinspection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection with automated electronic monitoring. Temperature sensors, vibration sensors, and acoustic sensors automatically detect steam trap conditions, substituting human operators with electronic detection systems that can monitor multiple traps simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring device performs multiple functions: temperature monitoring, vibration analysis, acoustic detection, and energy harvesting all in one unit. This multi-functional approach allows a single device to replace multiple inspection methods and scale to monitor hundreds of traps efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If simple temperature monitoring is used, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability of fault detection decreases due to inability to distinguish normal from abnormal conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring system simplicityVSAvoidfault detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple sensing modalities (temperature, vibration, acoustic) into a single integrated monitoring system. By combining these different measurement types, the system achieves reliable fault detection through data fusion while maintaining manageable device complexity through unified processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes baseline operational patterns from normal steam trap performance and continuously compares current readings against these baselines. This feedback mechanism enables the system to distinguish normal variations from actual faults, improving detection reliability without requiring overly complex analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enhances steam system efficiency by accurately monitoring steam trap conditions, reducing downtime, and eliminating the need for frequent battery replacements, thus improving overall system reliability and reducing operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

A battery-less steam trap monitoring device that converts environmental energy into usable power

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermoelectric effect: Seebeck Effect

Implementation Method 2

A battery-less steam trap monitoring device that converts environmental energy into usable power

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotovoltaic effect: Photovoltaic Effect

Implementation Method 3

A battery-less steam trap monitoring device that converts environmental energy into usable power

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11859764B2Steam trap monitoring devices, systems, and related techniques
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 SHOPLOGIX (U S) INC
  • US11859764B2 patent drawing
  • US11859764B2 patent drawing
  • US11859764B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices, systems, and techniques relating to steam trap monitoring are described. These include battery-less steam trap monitors that run on power harvested from their environments, systems for acquiring steam trap monitor data for the traps in a facility or across multiple facilities, and techniques for processing steam trap monitor data to reliably determine the status of individual steam traps and potentially other system parameters.