Steam Turbine Boundary Control for Faster Safe Acceleration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional steam turbine startup control strategies often result in longer than necessary time to reach rated operational speed, due to conservative fixed acceleration rates that avoid machine boundaries, leading to inefficient operation and potential system malfunctions during transitions between control modes.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for boundary control of a steam turbine during acceleration, utilizing a controller that dynamically adjusts steam flow between high and intermediate pressure sections based on real-time operational parameter data, allowing for rapid acceleration while minimizing excessive speed and ensuring undisturbed operation by interacting control modes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conservative fixed acceleration rates are used to avoid machine boundaries, then turbine safety is improved, but startup time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturbine safetyVSAvoidstartup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from fixed conservative acceleration rates to dynamic boundary control that adapts in real-time. The controller continuously adjusts acceleration rates based on current turbine state and boundary conditions, allowing the system to operate at maximum safe acceleration rather than fixed conservative rates, thereby reducing startup time while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by dynamically modifying acceleration rates and control mode transitions based on real-time boundary conditions. Instead of fixed parameters, the system continuously adjusts operational parameters (acceleration rates, valve positions) according to the turbine's current state and proximity to boundaries, enabling faster startup while ensuring safety constraints are met

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If rapid acceleration is implemented to reduce startup time, then productivity is improved, but risk of exceeding physical limits increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestartup speedVSAvoidboundary compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback through continuous monitoring of turbine state and boundary conditions. The controller receives real-time data on turbine parameters and compares them against defined boundaries, then adjusts acceleration rates and control actions accordingly. This closed-loop feedback ensures rapid acceleration can be achieved while automatically preventing exceedance of physical limits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic boundary control that adapts acceleration rates in real-time based on current operating conditions. Rather than fixed conservative limits, the control system dynamically calculates safe acceleration rates that maximize productivity while ensuring boundary compliance, allowing rapid startup when conditions permit while automatically reducing rates when approaching limits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple control modes are used to optimize turbine performance, then operational flexibility is improved, but complexity of control increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the startup process into distinct control modes (e.g., initial acceleration, intermediate acceleration, final acceleration phases). Each mode has specific control characteristics and boundary conditions, allowing optimized control for each phase while maintaining overall simplicity through clear mode transitions and defined boundaries

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2881554B1Systems and methods for boundary control during steam turbine acceleration
Publication Date: 2022.08.17 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP2881554B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2881554B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2881554B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Certain embodiments of the disclosure may include systems and methods for boundary control during steam turbine acceleration. According to an example embodiment, the method (600) can include receiving (602) an indication the turbine is in an initial acceleration phase; receiving (604) speed control parameter data from a plurality of sensors; receiving (606) boundary control parameter data from a plurality of sensors; providing (608) a control valve configured for controlling steam flow entering the turbine; determining (610) the control valve position based on received speed control parameter data; determining (612) the control valve position based on received boundary control parameter data; adjusting (616) at least one boundary control parameter to the at least one boundary control parameter limit during turbine startup, wherein the value of a speed control parameter is simultaneously adjusted based on the adjusted at least one boundary control parameter; and adjusting (618) the control valve position based at least on determined parameter data.