Steam Turbine Casing Layout for Flexible Valve Configurations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current steam turbine casing designs require multiple variants for single and multi-valve arrangements, leading to increased engineering effort, longer delivery times, higher inventory and production costs, and limited flexibility to accommodate different steam inlet directions, resulting in lost customer orders.

Innovation Solution

A customizable casing arrangement with machineable elements that can be altered to accommodate various valve configurations, allowing for multiple chamber arrangements and flexible steam inlet orientations, reducing the need for separate variants and enabling easier adaptation to different load points and steam flow requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple casing variants are designed for single and multi-valve arrangements, then the equipment can accommodate different valve configurations, but the engineering effort, delivery time, and inventory costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of different valve configurationsVSAvoiddelivery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The casing is designed with a universal structure that can accommodate both single-valve and multi-valve arrangements through selective machining of internal partitions. The basic casing design includes provision for multiple chambers that can be configured differently by machining away specific partition walls, allowing one casing variant to serve multiple valve arrangement purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The casing internal structure is segmented into multiple chambers separated by partition walls. These partition walls are designed to be selectively machined away to create different chamber configurations. The segmentation allows the same basic casing to be adapted into different variants by removing specific segments (partition walls) to accommodate single-valve or multi-valve arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple casing variants are designed for single and multi-valve arrangements, then the equipment can accommodate different valve configurations, but the inventory and production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of different valve configurationsVSAvoidproduction costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The casing is designed with a universal structure that can accommodate both single-valve and multi-valve arrangements through selective machining of internal partitions. The basic casing design includes provision for multiple chambers that can be configured differently by machining away specific partition walls, allowing one casing variant to serve multiple valve arrangement purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of maintaining separate inventory for different casing variants, the approach is to produce a universal casing and then selectively machine away specific partition walls as needed for each order. This discards the need to maintain multiple casing inventories and recovers the benefit of having specialized configurations through on-demand machining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Device complexity

If a single valve arrangement is used with fixed steam inlet direction, then the casing design is simplified, but flexibility to accommodate different steam inlet directions is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecasing design complexityVSAvoidflexibility of steam inlet orientation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The casing design incorporates dynamic adaptability through selective machining. The steam inlet orientation and internal chamber configurations can be dynamically adjusted by machining away specific partition walls, allowing the same basic casing design to adapt to different steam inlet directions and valve arrangements as required by the customer's specific application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3744952B1Casing arrangement for fluid power equipment
Publication Date: 2022.12.14 SIEMENS ENERGY GLOBAL GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3744952B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3744952B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3744952B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

The present invention is related to a casing (300) for a steam turbine being in communication with a valve arrangement, said casing (300) comprising a plurality of chambers (C1-C5) for admitting steam into the turbine and a plurality of machineable wall elements (301, 302, 303, 304, 305). By machining selectively one or more of the machineable wall elements (301, 302, 303, 304, 305), the number of a number of chambers (C1-C5) within said casing (300) may be reduced in correspondence with a selected valve arrangement such as a single valve configuration or a multi-valve arrangement. Thus, one standardised default casing may be customised to different applications.